Santman-Berends I M G A, Mars M H, Waldeck H W F, van Duijn L, Wever P, van den Broek K W H, van Schaik G
GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, The Netherlands.
GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, The Netherlands.
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Feb 1;150:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
In the Netherlands, the feasibility of a national control program for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) is discussed. The aim of this program would be to achieve freedom from BoHV1 circulation (the causal agent of IBR), in the Dutch cattle population. When IBR would be eradicated, maintaining the free status is essential and insight in the probability of introduction of IBR through cattle imports is crucial. Values for input parameters such as the number of imports per country of origin, herd level prevalence and probability that a random imported animal per age category was either acutely or latently infected with IBR were quantified. A stochastic simulation model was built to predict the basic risk and the efficacy of four risk mitigating scenarios were evaluated. These scenarios involved testing prior to import, import restrictions and vaccination. The model output predicted that IBR infected animals are imported regularly. In an IBR free situation, 571 (5th and 95th percentile: 431-781) cattle herds will be newly infected. Latent infections account for most newly infected herds (77%). When the virus in the imported latently infected animal does not reactivate, subsequent impact of such infections remains limited. The model predicted that most of the herds infected by introduction of acutely infected animals would be veal herds. The scenario in which imports were only allowed from status 9 or 10 countries combined with testing cattle that originated from status 9 countries was most effective in reduction of the import risk to 70 herds per year. The scenario in which vaccination of calves was combined with testing of older cattle was estimated to reduce the number of newly infected herds to 82 per year. The stakeholders classified the latter scenario as most realistic because this scenario was deemed both feasible and rather effective. This study did not evaluate the impact of introduction of IBR in the cattle population, which might differ depending on the type of infection (acute vs. latent) and the herd type in which the virus is introduced. Moreover, when making the final decision about the optimal intervention, the economic perspective should also be taken into account. This study predicted that introduction of IBR will remain a risk for the Dutch cattle population after virus circulation is eliminated from the Netherlands. The import risk is reduced most in scenarios in which testing and vaccination are combined.
在荷兰,人们讨论了一项针对牛传染性鼻气管炎(IBR)的国家防控计划的可行性。该计划的目标是在荷兰牛群中实现无牛疱疹病毒1型(BoHV1,即IBR的病原体)传播。当IBR被根除后,维持无病状态至关重要,而了解通过进口牛引入IBR的可能性则至关重要。对输入参数的值进行了量化,例如每个原产国的进口数量、畜群水平患病率以及每个年龄组随机进口动物急性或潜伏感染IBR的概率。构建了一个随机模拟模型来预测基本风险,并评估了四种降低风险方案的效果。这些方案包括进口前检测、进口限制和疫苗接种。模型输出预测,IBR感染动物会定期被进口。在无IBR的情况下,将有571个(第5和第95百分位数:431 - 781)牛群新被感染。潜伏感染占大多数新感染牛群(77%)。当进口的潜伏感染动物中的病毒不重新激活时,此类感染的后续影响仍然有限。模型预测,大多数因引入急性感染动物而被感染的牛群将是犊牛群。仅允许从状态9或10的国家进口并对来自状态9国家的牛进行检测的方案,在将进口风险降低至每年70个牛群方面最为有效。将犊牛疫苗接种与老龄牛检测相结合的方案估计可将新感染牛群数量减少至每年82个。利益相关者将后一种方案归类为最现实的方案,因为该方案被认为既可行又相当有效。本研究未评估IBR引入牛群后的影响,其影响可能因感染类型(急性与潜伏)以及引入病毒的牛群类型而异。此外,在做出关于最佳干预措施的最终决定时,还应考虑经济因素。本研究预测,在荷兰消除病毒传播后,IBR的引入对荷兰牛群而言仍将是一种风险。在检测和疫苗接种相结合的方案中,进口风险降低最多。