• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架断裂与不良事件无关:来自 ACT-1 多中心随机试验的结果(在标准风险的颈动脉内膜切除术适用人群中,对于有明显颅外颈动脉狭窄病变的无症状患者,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较)。

Carotid Stent Fractures Are Not Associated With Adverse Events: Results From the ACT-1 Multicenter Randomized Trial (Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease).

机构信息

Vascular Medicine Section and Vascular Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (I.W., K.R.)

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (J.A.B.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):49-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030030. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030030
PMID:28982691
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of carotid artery stent fractures on the incidence of adverse clinical events remains unclear. The objective of this study is to report the stent fracture rate and its association with in-stent restenosis and adverse outcomes in the ACT-1 trial (Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease).

METHODS

ACT-1 is a prospective multicenter trial of patients who have standard surgical risk with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis randomly assigned to carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy (Abbott Vascular). The primary end point was a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction during the 30 days after the procedure or ipsilateral stroke during the 365 days after the procedure. After 771 patients were enrolled, successively randomly assigned patients were required to undergo annual radiographic (x-ray) analysis for stent fracture. Images were independently adjudicated by a core laboratory.

RESULTS

Of 1021 patients treated with carotid artery stenting during a mean follow-up of 3.1±1.6 years, 939 had at least 1 x-ray during the follow-up period. Stent fracture was reported in 51 (5.4%) patients. With a maximum follow-up period of 5 years, adverse clinical outcomes occurred in 39 patients with at least 1 x-ray during the follow-up. Of 826 (80.9%) subjects who underwent both duplex ultrasound and x-ray, 822 (99.5%) were interpretable. There was no association between stent fracture and the primary end point (=0.86) or with restenosis (=0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, independently adjudicated, multicenter study, the stent fracture rate was low and not associated with major adverse clinical events or in-stent restenosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00106938.

摘要

背景

颈动脉支架断裂对不良临床事件发生率的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是报告 ACT-1 试验(无症状且标准颈动脉内膜切除术风险患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入与内膜切除术比较:伴明显颅外颈动脉狭窄的高危患者)中支架断裂的发生率及其与支架内再狭窄和不良结局的关系。

方法

ACT-1 是一项前瞻性多中心试验,纳入了标准手术风险且伴有严重无症状颈动脉狭窄的患者,这些患者被随机分配接受颈动脉支架置入或颈动脉内膜切除术(雅培血管)治疗。主要终点是术后 30 天内死亡、卒中和心肌梗死的复合终点,或术后 365 天内同侧卒中和心肌梗死的复合终点。在纳入了 771 例患者后,连续随机分配的患者需要每年进行支架断裂的影像学(X 线)分析。图像由核心实验室进行独立裁决。

结果

在平均 3.1±1.6 年的随访中,1021 例接受颈动脉支架置入治疗的患者中,939 例在随访期间至少进行了 1 次 X 线检查。51 例(5.4%)患者报告了支架断裂。在最长 5 年的随访期间,在随访期间至少进行了 1 次 X 线检查的 39 例患者中发生了不良临床结局。在 826 例(80.9%)同时进行了双功能超声和 X 线检查的患者中,822 例(99.5%)结果可解释。支架断裂与主要终点(=0.86)或支架内再狭窄(=0.53)无相关性。

结论

在这项大型、独立裁决、多中心研究中,支架断裂的发生率较低,与主要不良临床事件或支架内再狭窄无关。

临床试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00106938。

相似文献

1
Carotid Stent Fractures Are Not Associated With Adverse Events: Results From the ACT-1 Multicenter Randomized Trial (Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease).颈动脉支架断裂与不良事件无关:来自 ACT-1 多中心随机试验的结果(在标准风险的颈动脉内膜切除术适用人群中,对于有明显颅外颈动脉狭窄病变的无症状患者,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较)。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):49-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030030. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
Influence of multiple stents on periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄试验(CREST)中,颈动脉支架置入术后多发性支架对围手术期卒中的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.221. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
4
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
6
Carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy: 10-year randomized trial in a community hospital.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:社区医院的 10 年随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.010.
7
Carotid artery stenting outcomes are equivalent to carotid endarterectomy outcomes for patients with post-carotid endarterectomy stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术的结果与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄患者的结果相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.074. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
8
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
9
Retrograde stenting of proximal lesions with carotid endarterectomy increases risk.颈动脉内膜切除术对近端病变进行逆行支架置入会增加风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验完成随机分组:经验教训及预期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Asymptomatic Complete Spiral Stent Fracture in Subclavian Artery with Progressive Restenosis in the Early Postoperative Period: A Case Report.锁骨下动脉无症状性完全螺旋支架骨折伴术后早期进行性再狭窄:一例报告
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2024;18(7):191-196. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2024-0019. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
A proposed modern standardized technical approach for symptomatic chronic carotid total occlusion management.一种针对有症状的慢性颈动脉完全闭塞治疗的现代标准化技术方案。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jan 3:15910199231224006. doi: 10.1177/15910199231224006.
3
Acute ischemia secondary to popliteal artery stent fracture and embolization.
腘动脉支架断裂和栓塞继发的急性缺血
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Apr 23;9(3):101143. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101143. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Prevention of Stroke with Closed-Cell Stent-in-Stent for Carotid Artery Stenosis Due to Stent Fracture.使用闭孔支架置入术治疗因支架断裂导致的颈动脉狭窄以预防中风
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(1):52-55. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2020-0213. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
"Whiplash" cervical trauma with fracture and migration of carotid stent fragments.伴有颈动脉支架碎片骨折及移位的“挥鞭样”颈部创伤。
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Oct 8;11:329. doi: 10.25259/SNI_550_2020. eCollection 2020.
6
Personalized-medicine on carotid endarterectomy and stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术的个性化医疗
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1274. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1126.