• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高风险患者看重什么?对一项照护管理计划的观点。

What Do High-Risk Patients Value? Perspectives on a Care Management Program.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):26-33. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4200-1. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-017-4200-1
PMID:28983741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5756174/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in coordinating care for high-risk patients through care management programs despite inconsistent results on cost reduction. Early evidence suggests patient-centered benefits, but we know little about how participants engage with the programs and what aspects they value.

OBJECTIVE

To explore care management program participants' awareness and perceived utility of program offerings.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional telephone survey administered December 2015-January 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients enrolled in a Boston-area primary care-based care management program.

MAIN MEASURES

Our main outcome was the number of topics in which patients reported having "very helpful" interactions with their care team in the past year. We analyzed awareness of one's care manager as an intermediate outcome, and then as a primary predictor of the main outcome, along with patient demographics, years in the program, attitudes, and worries as secondary predictors.

KEY RESULTS

The survey response rate was 45.8% (n = 1220); non-respondents were similar to respondents. More respondents reported worrying about family (72.8%) or financial issues (52.5%) than about their own health (41.6%). Seventy-four percent reported care manager awareness, particularly women (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.77) and those with more years in the program (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.30). While interaction rates ranged from 19.8% to 72.4% across topics, 81.3% rated at least one interaction as very helpful. Those who were aware of their care manager reported very helpful interactions on more topics (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.15-3.56), as did women (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.55), younger respondents (OR 0.98 for older age, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), and those with higher risk scores (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), preference for deferring treatment decisions to doctors (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.60-2.50), and reported control over their health (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.33-2.10).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk patients reported helpful interactions with their care team around medical and social determinants of health, particularly those who knew their care manager. Promoting care manager awareness may help participants make better use of the program.

摘要

背景

尽管降低成本的效果不一致,但人们对通过护理管理计划协调高危患者的护理越来越感兴趣。早期证据表明以患者为中心的获益,但我们对参与者如何参与该计划以及他们重视哪些方面知之甚少。

目的

探讨护理管理计划参与者对计划提供的服务的认知和感知效用。

设计

2015 年 12 月至 2016 年 1 月进行的横断面电话调查。

参与者

参与波士顿地区基于初级保健的护理管理计划的患者。

主要措施

我们的主要结果是患者报告在过去一年中与他们的护理团队在哪些主题上有“非常有帮助”的互动。我们将对护理经理的认知作为中间结果进行分析,然后将其作为主要结果的主要预测指标,同时将患者人口统计学,项目年限,态度和担忧作为次要预测指标。

主要结果

调查回复率为 45.8%(n=1220);未回复者与回复者相似。更多的受访者表示担心家庭(72.8%)或财务问题(52.5%),而不是自己的健康(41.6%)。74%的人报告了对护理经理的认识,尤其是女性(OR 1.33,95%CI 1.01-1.77)和在该项目中工作年限较长的人(OR 1.16,95%CI 1.03-1.30)。尽管各个主题的互动率从 19.8%到 72.4%不等,但有 81.3%的受访者对至少一次互动评价为非常有帮助。那些知道自己护理经理的人报告说,在更多主题上的互动非常有帮助(OR 2.77,95%CI 2.15-3.56),女性(OR 1.25,95%CI 1.00-1.55),年轻的受访者(OR 0.98 岁以上,95%CI 0.97-0.99),以及风险评分较高的受访者(OR 1.04,95%CI 1.02-1.06),更倾向于将治疗决策推迟给医生(OR 2.00,95%CI 1.60-2.50),并报告对自己的健康有控制感(OR 1.67,95%CI 1.33-2.10)。

结论

高危患者报告在医疗和健康的社会决定因素方面与他们的护理团队有帮助的互动,特别是那些了解他们的护理经理的人。提高对护理经理的认识可能有助于参与者更好地利用该计划。

相似文献

1
What Do High-Risk Patients Value? Perspectives on a Care Management Program.高风险患者看重什么?对一项照护管理计划的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):26-33. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4200-1. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Involuntary disenrollment from a Medicare managed care plan at an academic medical center: effect on patients.学术医疗中心医疗保险管理式医疗计划的非自愿退出:对患者的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Sep;48(9):1151-6.
3
4
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
5
Effect of an Intensive Outpatient Program to Augment Primary Care for High-Need Veterans Affairs Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化门诊计划对满足高需求退伍军人事务患者的初级保健的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):166-175. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8021.
6
Perceived value of a home-based medication therapy management program for the elderly.针对老年人的居家药物治疗管理项目的感知价值。
Consult Pharm. 2008 Nov;23(11):877-85. doi: 10.4140/tcp.n.2008.877.
7
Eligibility for the Medicare buy-in programs, based on a survey of income and program participation simulation.基于收入调查和项目参与模拟的医疗保险购买计划资格。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(3):13-25.
8
Physician incentives and disclosure of payment methods to patients.医生激励措施及向患者披露支付方式
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.04139.x.
9
10
Assessing health system provision of well-child care: The Promoting Healthy Development Survey.评估卫生系统提供的儿童健康保健服务:促进健康发展调查
Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1084-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1084.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening tools for employment in clinical healthcare delivery systems: a content analysis.临床医疗服务系统就业筛选工具:内容分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 11;24(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10976-3.
2
Nursing Value Analysis and Risk Evaluation of Acute Gastroenterology Diseases.急性消化内科疾病的护理价值分析及风险评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Sep 30;2021:8245177. doi: 10.1155/2021/8245177. eCollection 2021.
3
Outcomes that Matter: High-Needs Patients' and Primary Care Leaders' Perspectives on an Intensive Primary Care Pilot.重要结果:高需求患者和初级保健领导者对强化初级保健试点项目的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3366-3372. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06869-4. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
Clustering Complex Chronic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Community Study From the General Practitioner's Perspective.对复杂慢性病患者进行聚类分析:一项从全科医生视角开展的横断面社区研究
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 19;21(2):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5496.
5
Exploring and Overcoming the Challenges Primary Care Practices Face with Care Management of High-Risk Patients in CPC+: a Mixed-Methods Study.探索和克服初级保健实践在 CPC+中面临的高风险患者护理管理挑战:一项混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3008-3014. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06528-0. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
"Not Alone Anymore": The Experiences of Adults With Diabetes in New York's Medicaid Health Home Program.“不再孤单”:纽约医疗补助健康之家项目中成年糖尿病患者的经历
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S60-S65. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001296.
7
"It's Like Riding Out the Chaos": Caring for Socially Complex Patients in an Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit (A-ICU).“就像驾驭混沌”:在门诊重症监护病房(A-ICU)照顾社会关系复杂的患者。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Nov;17(6):495-501. doi: 10.1370/afm.2464.
8
Segmentation of High-Cost Adults in an Integrated Healthcare System Based on Empirical Clustering of Acute and Chronic Conditions.基于急性和慢性疾病实证聚类的综合医疗保健系统中高费用成人的细分
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2171-2179. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4626-0. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Engaging High-Need Patients in Intensive Outpatient Programs: A Qualitative Synthesis of Engagement Strategies.参与强化门诊项目的高需求患者:参与策略的定性综合
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1937-1944. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4608-2. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
10
Variability in Care Management Programs in Medicare ACOs: A Survey of Medical Directors.医疗保险负责医疗组织(ACO)中护理管理项目的差异:对医疗主任的一项调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2043-2045. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4609-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A Scalable Program for Customized Patient Education Videos.一个用于定制患者教育视频的可扩展程序。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Nov;43(11):606-610. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
2
What can five high cost patients teach us about healthcare spending?五个高花费患者能教会我们哪些关于医疗支出的知识?
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Dec;5(4):204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Effect of an Intensive Outpatient Program to Augment Primary Care for High-Need Veterans Affairs Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化门诊计划对满足高需求退伍军人事务患者的初级保健的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):166-175. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8021.
4
Cost Containment and the Tale of Care Coordination.成本控制与护理协调的故事
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2218-2220. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1610821.
5
How High-Need Patients Experience Health Care in the United States. Findings from the 2016 Commonwealth Fund Survey of High-Need Patients.高需求患者在美国如何体验医疗保健。2016年英联邦基金会高需求患者调查结果。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Dec;43:1-20.
6
Addressing Unmet Basic Resource Needs as Part of Chronic Cardiometabolic Disease Management.满足未得到满足的基本资源需求作为慢性心脏代谢疾病管理的一部分。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):244-252. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7691.
7
Implementing a hybrid approach to select patients for care management: variations across practices.采用混合方法为护理管理选择患者:不同医疗机构之间的差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 May;22(5):358-65.
8
Achieving care integration from the patients' perspective: Results from a care management program.从患者角度实现护理整合:一项护理管理项目的结果
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Mar;4(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
Addressing basic resource needs to improve primary care quality: a community collaboration programme.满足基本资源需求以提高初级保健质量:社区合作方案。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):164-72. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004521. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
For many patients who use large amounts of health care services, the need is intense yet temporary.对于许多使用大量医疗服务的患者来说,这种需求是强烈的,但却是暂时的。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Aug;34(8):1312-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1186.