• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持和否定结直肠癌风险预防行为:配偶讨论分析。

Support and negation of colorectal cancer risk prevention behaviors: analysis of spousal discussions.

机构信息

a Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior , Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa , FL , USA.

b Psychology Department , Brigham Young University , Provo , UT , USA.

出版信息

Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jun;23(5):548-554. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1381747. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1080/13548506.2017.1381747
PMID:28984149
Abstract

The shared social context created in a marriage may be important in motivating engagement in health behaviors, but spousal influence may not be uniformly applied. Our goal was to examine how spouses discuss health behaviors relevant for colorectal cancer (CRC) risk-reduction to better understand how spouses exert or fail to exert influence. In this pilot study, first degree relatives of CRC patients and their spouses completed demographic and self-reported health questionnaires. After a genetic counseling session regarding risk and risk reduction, couples engaged in a semi-structured discussion task to discuss lifestyle choices they currently undertake or could undertake to reduce risk. Demographic and health data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Using a directed content analysis based on the transtheoretical model of behavior change, we coded discussion transcripts for depth and direction of talk for seven behavioral CRC risk factors. Spouses engaged in several strategies to reduce their risk for CRC, and problem-solved together to increase these preventative efforts. All couples mentioned diet and exercise as important factors in CRC risk; however, other risk factors received less attention. Despite evidence of support and encouragement, spouses ignored, minimized, or negated the importance of some health behaviors. Spousal influence could be an important tool to improve participation in health behaviors, but more guidance may be necessary to hold couples accountable to evidence-based guidelines to reduce risk. Health care providers should address couples as a unit to assess and address health behaviors.

摘要

婚姻中共同的社会背景可能对激励人们参与健康行为很重要,但配偶的影响可能并不统一。我们的目标是研究配偶之间如何讨论与降低结直肠癌(CRC)风险相关的健康行为,以更好地理解配偶如何施加或未能施加影响。在这项初步研究中,CRC 患者的一级亲属及其配偶完成了人口统计学和自我报告的健康问卷。在进行了关于风险和降低风险的遗传咨询后,夫妇们参与了一个半结构化的讨论任务,讨论他们目前正在采取或可以采取哪些生活方式选择来降低风险。使用描述性统计方法分析人口统计学和健康数据。我们使用基于行为改变跨理论模型的定向内容分析,为七个行为 CRC 风险因素的讨论记录进行了深度和方向的编码。配偶们采取了几种策略来降低他们患 CRC 的风险,并共同解决问题以增加这些预防措施。所有夫妇都提到饮食和运动是 CRC 风险的重要因素;然而,其他风险因素则受到较少关注。尽管有支持和鼓励的证据,但配偶们忽视、最小化或否定了一些健康行为的重要性。配偶的影响可能是提高健康行为参与度的重要工具,但可能需要更多的指导,以使夫妇对基于证据的指南负责,以降低风险。医疗保健提供者应该将夫妇作为一个整体来评估和解决健康行为问题。

相似文献

1
Support and negation of colorectal cancer risk prevention behaviors: analysis of spousal discussions.支持和否定结直肠癌风险预防行为:配偶讨论分析。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jun;23(5):548-554. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1381747. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
2
Difference of Opinion: Spousal Influence on Cancer Risk-reducing Behavior.意见分歧:配偶对降低癌症风险行为的影响
Am J Health Behav. 2019 May 1;43(3):582-590. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.43.3.12.
3
Correspondence of physical activity and fruit/vegetable consumption among prostate cancer survivors and their spouses.前列腺癌幸存者及其配偶的身体活动与水果/蔬菜摄入量的相关性
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Nov;24(6):827-39. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12316. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
4
Screening in spouses of colorectal cancer patients: a missed opportunity.对结直肠癌患者配偶进行筛查:错失的机会。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):419-422. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2975-0. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
The Role of Aspirin, Vitamin D, Exercise, Diet, Statins, and Metformin in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.阿司匹林、维生素D、运动、饮食、他汀类药物和二甲双胍在结直肠癌预防和治疗中的作用
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):43. doi: 10.1007/s11864-015-0359-z.
6
Differences between husbands and wives in colonoscopy use: Results from a national sample of married couples.夫妻在结肠镜检查使用方面的差异:来自全国已婚夫妇样本的结果。
Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
7
Nature of spousal supportive behaviors that influence heart transplant patient compliance.影响心脏移植患者依从性的配偶支持行为的本质。
J Heart Transplant. 1987 Mar-Apr;6(2):90-5.
8
Project TEAMS (Talking about Eating, Activity, and Mutual Support): a randomized controlled trial of a theory-based weight loss program for couples.项目TEAMS(谈论饮食、活动及相互支持):一项针对夫妻的基于理论的减肥计划的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4732-7.
9
Association of military life experiences and health indicators among military spouses.军人配偶的军旅生活经历与健康指标的相关性。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):1517. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7804-z.
10
Mechanisms of patient health behavior change in a randomized controlled trial of a spouse-assisted intervention.配偶辅助干预随机对照试验中患者健康行为改变的机制
Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(7):753-66. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1020817. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors, quality of life, and health behaviors of cancer survivors and their spouses: findings from MEPS.癌症幸存者及其配偶的心血管疾病患病率和危险因素、生活质量以及健康行为:来自 MEPS 的调查结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Oct;13(5):739-748. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00792-8. Epub 2019 Aug 22.