Suppr超能文献

影响肺癌脑转移患者全脑放疗后生存的预后因素。

Prognostic factors affecting survival after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasized lung cancer.

机构信息

a Department of Oncology , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden.

b Department of Oncology and Pathology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2018 Feb;57(2):231-238. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1386799. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the standard of care for multiple NSCLC brain metastases but due to its toxicity and lack of survival benefit, its use in the palliative setting is being questioned.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This was a single institution cohort study including brain metastasized lung cancer patients who received WBRT at Karolinska University Hospital. Information about Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) and Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) scores, demographics, histopathological results and received oncological therapy were collected. Predictors of overall survival (OS) from the time of received WBRT were identified by Cox regression analyses. OS between GPA and RPA classes were compared by pairwise log rank test. A subgroup OS analysis was performed stratified by RPA class.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 280 patients. RPA 1 and 2 classes had better OS compared to class 3, patients with GPA <1.5 points had better OS compared to GPA≥ 1.5 points and age >70 years was associated with worse OS (p< .0001 for all comparisons). In RPA class 2 subgroup analysis GPA ≥1.5 points, age ≤70 years and CNS surgery before salvage WBRT were independent positive prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

RPA class 3 patients should not receive WBRT, whereas RPA class 1 patients should receive WBRT if clinically indicated. RPA class 2 patients with age ≤70 years and GPA ≥1.5 points should be treated as RPA 1. WBRT should be omitted in RPA 2 patients with age >70. In RPA 2 patients with age ≤70 years and GPA <1.5 points WBRT could be a reasonable option.

摘要

背景

全脑放疗(WBRT)一直是治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移的标准治疗方法,但由于其毒性和缺乏生存获益,其在姑息治疗中的应用受到质疑。

患者和方法

这是一项单机构队列研究,包括在卡罗林斯卡大学医院接受 WBRT 的脑转移肺癌患者。收集了关于递归分区分析(RPA)和分级预后评估(GPA)评分、人口统计学、组织病理学结果和接受的肿瘤治疗的信息。通过 Cox 回归分析确定了从接受 WBRT 开始的总生存期(OS)的预测因素。通过两两对数秩检验比较 GPA 和 RPA 类别的 OS。对 RPA 类别的亚组进行了 OS 分析。

结果

该队列包括 280 名患者。RPA 1 和 2 类的 OS 优于 3 类,GPA<1.5 分的患者 OS 优于 GPA≥1.5 分的患者,年龄>70 岁与 OS 较差相关(所有比较的 p<0.0001)。在 RPA 2 亚组分析中,年龄≤70 岁、在挽救性 WBRT 前进行 CNS 手术、GPA≥1.5 分是独立的阳性预后因素。

结论

RPA 3 类患者不应接受 WBRT,而 RPA 1 类患者如果临床需要则应接受 WBRT。年龄≤70 岁且 GPA≥1.5 分的 RPA 2 类患者应视为 RPA 1 类。年龄>70 岁的 RPA 2 类患者应避免 WBRT。年龄≤70 岁且 GPA<1.5 分的 RPA 2 类患者,WBRT 可能是合理的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验