Department of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Intensive Care Unit - Clinical Toxicology, Bucharest, Romania.
Am J Ther. 2018 Jul/Aug;25(4):e447-e452. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000607.
We discuss homeopathy's placebo effect as the result of a distributed therapeutic agency involving humans, objects, and texts. Homeopathy has been involved in controversies for centuries, and the dispute whether it is therapy or quackery is as lively as ever. Still, homeopathy has retained significant popularity and acceptance within the medical establishment.
We bracket the issue of biochemical effectiveness of homeopathic remedies as we only discuss homeopathy's potential to elicit a placebo response within its therapeutic alliance, in virtue of its social, symbolic, and material features.
The review is based on literature discussing homeopathic effectiveness, including historical, biographical, sociological, and epistemological perspectives. We build upon research that clarifies the therapeutic relationship, examining its activities and meanings for practitioners and patients.
Previous analyses discussing homeopathy's placebo effect stress the importance of the individualized consultation that functions as psychotherapy and generates empathy and hope. We enlarge the discussion, highlighting homeopathy's distributed therapeutic agency across humans, texts, and materials. The historical evolution of homeopathy in relation to biomedicine and science is important to understand its institutional integration into mainstream medicine and its appeal to scientifically minded doctors. Anecdotes of healing and the message of no-harm encourage patients to try homeopathy and hope for the best. The esthetics and ritual of remedies, coupled with computers' scientific legitimacy and time-saving power constitute a material infrastructure of therapeutic persuasion.
Through its relation with biomedicine, its doctrine, consultation design, and treatment rituals, homeopathy offers a powerful medium to elicit a placebo response in a therapeutic alliance. By virtue of its proximity and radical difference from the scientific and biomedical enterprises, its material and textual organization, its storytelling and esthetics, homeopathy offers doctors and patients the opportunity and the tools to collaborate, to witness healing, and to hope for success against adversity.
我们讨论顺势疗法的安慰剂效应是一个涉及人类、物体和文本的分布式治疗机构的结果。顺势疗法几个世纪以来一直存在争议,关于它是治疗方法还是庸医的争论仍然非常激烈。尽管如此,顺势疗法在医疗体系中仍然保持着相当大的受欢迎程度和接受度。
我们将顺势疗法药物的生化有效性问题搁置一旁,因为我们只讨论顺势疗法在其治疗联盟中产生安慰剂反应的潜力,这是基于其社会、符号和物质特征。
该综述基于讨论顺势疗法有效性的文献,包括历史、传记、社会学和认识论视角。我们以澄清治疗关系的研究为基础,考察其对从业者和患者的活动和意义。
以前讨论顺势疗法安慰剂效应的分析强调了个体化咨询的重要性,这种咨询起到了心理治疗的作用,产生了同理心和希望。我们扩大了讨论范围,强调了顺势疗法在人类、文本和材料之间的分布式治疗机构。顺势疗法与生物医学和科学的历史演变对于理解其机构整合到主流医学中及其对有科学头脑的医生的吸引力非常重要。治愈的轶事和无伤害的信息鼓励患者尝试顺势疗法并抱有最好的希望。药物的美学和仪式,加上计算机的科学合法性和节省时间的能力,构成了治疗说服力的物质基础设施。
通过与生物医学的关系、其学说、咨询设计和治疗仪式,顺势疗法为在治疗联盟中产生安慰剂反应提供了有力的媒介。由于其与科学和生物医学企业的接近性和根本性差异、其物质和文本组织、其讲故事和美学,顺势疗法为医生和患者提供了合作、见证治愈和在逆境中取得成功的机会和工具。