Department of Pediatrics, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Department of Pulmonology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2018 Feb;191(2):203-211. doi: 10.1111/cei.13065. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Isolated decreased serum-immunoglobulin (Ig)M has been associated with severe and/or recurrent infections, atopy and autoimmunity. However, the reported high prevalence of clinical problems in IgM-deficient patients may reflect the skewed tertiary centre population studied so far. Also, many papers on IgM deficiency have included patients with more abnormalities than simply IgM-deficiency. We studied truly selective primary IgM deficiency according to the diagnostic criteria of the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) (true sIgMdef) by reviewing the literature (261 patients with primary decreased serum-IgM in 46 papers) and analysing retrospectively all patients with decreased serum-IgM in a large teaching hospital in 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands [1 July 2005-23 March 2016; n = 8049 IgM < 0·4 g/l; n = 2064 solitary (IgG+IgA normal/IgM < age-matched reference)]. A total of 359 of 2064 (17%) cases from our cohort had primary isolated decreased serum-IgM, proven persistent in 45 of 359 (13%) cases; their medical charts were reviewed. Our main finding is that true sIgMdef is probably very rare. Only six of 261 (2%) literature cases and three of 45 (7%) cases from our cohort fulfilled the ESID criteria completely; 63 of 261 (24%) literature cases also had other immunological abnormalities and fulfilled the criteria for unclassified antibody deficiencies (unPAD) instead. The diagnosis was often uncertain (possible sIgMdef): data on IgG subclasses and/or vaccination responses were lacking in 192 of 261 (74%) literature cases and 42 of 45 (93%) cases from our cohort. Our results also illustrate the clinical challenge of determining the relevance of a serum sample with decreased IgM; a larger cohort of true sIgMdef patients is needed to explore fully its clinical consequences. The ESID online Registry would be a useful tool for this.
孤立性血清免疫球蛋白(Ig)M 减少与严重和/或复发性感染、特应性和自身免疫有关。然而,据报道,IgM 缺陷患者的临床问题高发可能反映了迄今为止研究的偏倚的三级中心人群。此外,许多关于 IgM 缺乏的论文包括的患者除了单纯 IgM 缺乏外,还有更多的异常。我们根据欧洲免疫缺陷学会(ESID)的诊断标准(真正的 sIgMdef)研究了真正选择性原发性 IgM 缺乏症,通过回顾文献(46 篇论文中 261 例原发性血清 IgM 减少患者)并分析了荷兰's-Hertogenbosch 一家大型教学医院的所有血清 IgM 减少患者的回顾性资料[2005 年 7 月 1 日-2016 年 3 月 23 日;n=8049 IgM<0.4g/l;n=2064 例(IgG+IgA 正常/IgM<年龄匹配参考值)。我们队列中的 2064 例患者中有 359 例(17%)存在原发性孤立性血清 IgM 减少,其中 45 例(13%)持续存在;对他们的病历进行了回顾。我们的主要发现是,真正的 sIgMdef 可能非常罕见。我们队列中的 261 例文献病例中只有 6 例(2%)和 45 例中的 3 例(7%)完全符合 ESID 标准;261 例文献病例中有 63 例(24%)也有其他免疫异常,符合未分类抗体缺陷(unPAD)的标准。诊断通常不确定(可能的 sIgMdef):261 例文献病例中有 192 例(74%)和我们队列中的 42 例(93%)缺乏 IgG 亚类和/或疫苗反应的数据。我们的结果还说明了确定 IgM 减少的血清样本相关性的临床挑战;需要更大的真正 sIgMdef 患者队列来充分探索其临床后果。ESID 在线注册将是一个有用的工具。