Colello Michael J, Ivey Lauren E, Gainey Jordan, Faulkner Rakiya V, Johnson Ashleigh, Brechtel Leanne, Madeline Lee, Nathaniel Thomas I
University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, SC, USA.
Greenville Health System, SC, USA.
Adv Med Sci. 2018 Mar;63(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
In a stroke population, women have a worse outcome than men when untreated. In contrast, there is no significant difference in treated patients. In this study, we determined whether clinical variables represent a promising approach to assist in the evaluation of gender differences in a stroke population.
We analyzed data from ischemic stroke patients' ≥18 years-old from the stroke registry on rtPA administration and identified gender differences in clinical factors within inclusion and exclusion criteria in a stroke population that received rtPA. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for patient demographic and clinical variables.
Of the 241 eligible stroke patients' thrombolytic therapy, 49.4% were females and 50.6% were males. Of the 422 patients that did not receive rtPA, more women (235) were excluded from rtPA than men (187) (P<0.05). In the male population, exclusion from rtPA was associated with history of a previous stroke (P<0.05, OR=2.028), hypertension (P<0.05, OR=0.519), and NIH stroke score (P<0.0001, OR=0.893). In female stroke patients, exclusion from rtPA was associated with previous history of stroke (P<0.05, OR=2.332), diabetes (P<0.05, OR=1.88) and NIH stroke score (P<0.05, OR=0.916).
Despite similarities in different areas of stroke care for both men and women, more women with diabetes, previous history of stroke and higher NIH scores are more likely to be excluded from thrombolytic therapy. Men with a previous history of stroke, hypertension and higher NIH scores are more likely to be excluded rtPA even after adjustment for confounding variables.
在中风人群中,未经治疗时女性的预后比男性更差。相比之下,接受治疗的患者中则无显著差异。在本研究中,我们确定临床变量是否是一种有助于评估中风人群性别差异的有效方法。
我们分析了来自中风登记处年龄≥18岁的缺血性中风患者接受rtPA治疗的数据,并确定了接受rtPA治疗的中风人群在纳入和排除标准内临床因素的性别差异。采用多变量分析来调整患者的人口统计学和临床变量。
在241例符合条件的中风患者溶栓治疗中,49.4%为女性,50.6%为男性。在422例未接受rtPA治疗的患者中,被排除在rtPA治疗之外的女性(235例)多于男性(187例)(P<0.05)。在男性人群中,被排除在rtPA治疗之外与既往中风史(P<0.05,OR=2.028)、高血压(P<0.05,OR=0.519)和美国国立卫生研究院中风量表评分(P<0.0001,OR=0.893)有关。在女性中风患者中,被排除在rtPA治疗之外与既往中风史(P<0.05,OR=2.332)、糖尿病(P<0.05,OR=1.88)和美国国立卫生研究院中风量表评分(P<0.05,OR=0.916)有关。
尽管男女在中风护理的不同方面存在相似之处,但更多患有糖尿病、有中风既往史且美国国立卫生研究院评分较高的女性更有可能被排除在溶栓治疗之外。即使在对混杂变量进行调整后,有中风既往史、高血压且美国国立卫生研究院评分较高的男性更有可能被排除在rtPA治疗之外。