Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Previous randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses have failed to collectively favor either open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation. The purpose of our investigation was to elucidate the optimal decision between ORIF and IMN for acute traumatic operative humeral shaft fractures through an expected value decision analysis.
We performed an expected value decision analysis and sensitivity analysis to elucidate the difference between ORIF and IMN fixation for patients with acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures. We surveyed 100 consecutive, randomly selected volunteers for their outcome preferences. Outcomes included union, delayed union, major complications, minor complications, and infection. A literature review was used to establish probabilities for each of these respective outcomes. A decision tree was constructed and a fold-back analysis was performed to find an expected patient value for each treatment option.
The overall patient expected values for ORIF and IMN were 12.7 and 11.2, respectively. Despite artificially decreasing the rates of major complications, infection, delayed union, and nonunion each to 0% for IMN fixation (sensitivity analysis), ORIF continued to maintain a greater overall patient expected value (12.7 vs. 11.4, 11.2, 11.2, and 12.1, respectively). Only if the rate of nonunion after ORIF was increased from 6.1% to 16.8% did the overall expected outcome after ORIF equal that of IMN (11.2).
Our expected value decision analysis demonstrates that patients favor ORIF over IMN as the optimal treatment decision for an acute traumatic humeral shaft fracture.
先前的随机对照研究和荟萃分析均未能一致支持切开复位内固定(ORIF)或髓内钉固定(IMN)。我们的研究目的是通过预期值决策分析阐明急性创伤性肱骨干骨折 ORIF 和 IMN 固定之间的最佳决策。
我们进行了预期值决策分析和敏感性分析,以阐明急性创伤性肱骨干骨折患者 ORIF 和 IMN 固定之间的差异。我们调查了 100 名连续的、随机选择的志愿者,了解他们对结果的偏好。结果包括愈合、延迟愈合、主要并发症、次要并发症和感染。文献复习用于确定这些结果各自的概率。构建决策树并进行回溯分析,以找到每个治疗选择的预期患者值。
ORIF 和 IMN 的总体患者预期值分别为 12.7 和 11.2。尽管人为地将 IMN 固定的主要并发症、感染、延迟愈合和不愈合的发生率降低到 0%(敏感性分析),ORIF 仍然保持了更大的总体患者预期值(12.7 比 11.4、11.2、11.2 和 12.1)。只有将 ORIF 后的不愈合率从 6.1%增加到 16.8%,ORIF 后的总体预期结果才与 IMN 相等(11.2)。
我们的预期值决策分析表明,患者倾向于将 ORIF 作为急性创伤性肱骨干骨折的最佳治疗决策,而不是 IMN。