Gerhardt-Szép Susanne, Dreher Stefanie, Rüttermann Stefan, Weberschock Tobias
Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung, Carolinum Zahnärztliches Universitäts-Institut gGmbH, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung, Carolinum Zahnärztliches Universitäts-Institut gGmbH, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Nov;127-128:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Computer-assisted learning (CAL) programs are becoming more widely used in medical and dental training. However, the combination of CAL programs and evidence-based education in dentistry has not been described previously. The aim was to determine the acceptance and user-friendliness of a CAL program combined with evidence-based training.
The didactic concept of the module includes the case-oriented, problem-based embedding of a total of 32 EbM learning assignments, which can be completed interactively and self-determinedly in an interdisciplinary context using focus patients with different diseases. The present study was conducted at the Dental School of the Goethe University in Frankfurt/Main. Data on acceptance and user-friendliness were collected from three consecutive cohorts of 114 dental students attending their first clinical semester. They used the "Toothache Walk-in Clinic: FOCUS" CAL, which can be downloaded via the Internet. The instrument consisted of 64 statements. The first part addressed general information about the user. The second part contained 43 specific statements on the CAL program. These included factors A (handling and technical aspects), B (content and functional range), and C (didactics and suitability for education). Possible responses ranged from 0 to 3 (0 = strongly disagree, 3 = strongly agree).
All of the 114 questionnaires distributed were returned (response rate 100%). Most users (90.1%) considered the topics of evidence-based dentistry important for their training. They rated the program by using German school grades, and the overall rating was 2.26 (SD = 0.64). Most students (88.6%) considered the program useful for their clinical training in the treatment of patients. The mean scores for the 43 specific items amounted to 1.90 (factor A, SD = 0.63), 1.55 (factor B, SD = 1.93), and 2.23 (factor C, SD = 0.79).
The CAL program with dental medicine vignettes and learning elements for evidence-based medicine received a primarily positive assessment. Students welcome that EbM contents are offered as part of their dental studies curriculum.
计算机辅助学习（CAL）程序在医学和牙科培训中的应用越来越广泛。然而，CAL程序与牙科循证教育的结合此前尚未有过描述。本研究旨在确定结合循证培训的CAL程序的接受度和用户友好性。
该模块的教学理念包括以案例为导向、基于问题地嵌入总共32项循证医学学习任务，这些任务可以在跨学科背景下，通过患有不同疾病的重点患者进行交互式和自主式完成。本研究在法兰克福/美因河畔歌德大学牙科学院开展。从连续三个队列的114名处于首个临床学期的牙科学生中收集关于接受度和用户友好性的数据。他们使用可通过互联网下载的“牙痛门诊：重点”CAL程序。该工具由64条陈述组成。第一部分涉及用户的一般信息。第二部分包含43条关于CAL程序的具体陈述。这些陈述包括因素A（操作和技术方面）、B（内容和功能范围）以及C（教学方法和教育适用性）。可能的回答范围是0至3（0 = 强烈不同意，3 = 强烈同意）。
分发的114份问卷全部收回（回复率100%）。大多数用户（90.1%）认为循证牙科主题对他们的培训很重要。他们用德国学校成绩对该程序进行评分，总体评分为2.26（标准差 = 0.64）。大多数学生（88.6%）认为该程序对他们治疗患者的临床培训有用。43项具体条目的平均得分分别为1.90（因素A，标准差 = 0.63）、1.55（因素B，标准差 = 1.93）和2.23（因素C，标准差 = 0.79）。
带有牙科医学案例和循证医学学习元素的CAL程序获得了主要为积极的评价。学生们欢迎将循证医学内容作为他们牙科学习课程的一部分提供。
