• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于修复肩袖撕裂的缝合锚钉最小间距:一项生物力学研究。

Minimum Distance of Suture Anchors Used for Rotator Cuff Repair Without Decreasing the Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Kurihara Central Hospital, Kurihara, Japan.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.022
PMID:28987400
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the minimum distance between the anchors without decreasing the pullout strength using the polyurethane foams and the porcine bones.

METHODS

Metal screw-type anchors and PEEK (polyether ether ketone) coil-type anchors were used. Two same-type suture anchors were placed into the polyurethane foams and porcine bones. The polyurethane foams were 3 different densities simulating severe osteoporosis, osteoporosis, and normal bone. The distances between the centers of anchors were set at 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm. The pair of anchors were loaded to failure if they had not been pulled out after cyclic loading from 50 to 200 N, 10 cycles per each 50-N increment. Mode of failure, ultimate load to failure, displacement of the anchor, and number of cycles completed were recorded.

RESULTS

In all polyurethane foams of 3 different densities with use of metal screw-type anchors, the 4-mm group demonstrated a significantly lower ultimate load to failure compared with the 6-, 8-, and 10-mm groups (P < .01). There were no significant differences in the load to failure among the 6-, 8-, and 10-mm groups. Porcine bone or PEEK coil-type anchor showed results similar to those of the metal screw-type anchors.

CONCLUSION

For the 2 tested anchors, the minimum distance between the anchors without decreasing the pullout strength was 6 mm (center to center) regardless of bone density in a biomechanical study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although it has been thought that the minimum distance between the anchors without decreasing the pullout strength was 1 cm (center to center), our data showed that it was 6 mm.

摘要

目的

使用聚氨酯泡沫和猪骨来研究不降低拔出强度的情况下锚钉之间的最小距离。

方法

使用金属螺钉型锚钉和 PEEK(聚醚醚酮)线圈型锚钉。将两个相同类型的缝合锚钉放置在聚氨酯泡沫和猪骨中。聚氨酯泡沫模拟严重骨质疏松、骨质疏松和正常骨三种不同密度。锚钉中心之间的距离设定为 4、6、8 和 10 mm。如果在从 50 到 200 N、每 50 N 增加 10 次循环加载后,锚钉没有被拔出,则对这对锚钉进行加载直至失效。记录失效模式、最终拔出载荷、锚钉位移和完成的循环次数。

结果

在使用金属螺钉型锚钉的所有三种不同密度的聚氨酯泡沫中,4 mm 组的最终拔出载荷明显低于 6、8 和 10 mm 组(P <.01)。6、8 和 10 mm 组之间的拔出载荷无显著差异。猪骨或 PEEK 线圈型锚钉的结果与金属螺钉型锚钉相似。

结论

在这项生物力学研究中,对于这两种测试的锚钉,无论骨密度如何,不降低拔出强度的情况下,锚钉之间的最小距离为 6 mm(中心到中心)。

临床相关性

虽然人们一直认为不降低拔出强度的情况下锚钉之间的最小距离为 1 cm(中心到中心),但我们的数据表明最小距离为 6 mm。

相似文献

1
Minimum Distance of Suture Anchors Used for Rotator Cuff Repair Without Decreasing the Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Study.用于修复肩袖撕裂的缝合锚钉最小间距:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update.肩袖和盂唇锚定物的拔出强度的循环加载生物力学分析:2013 更新版。
Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):832-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
3
Pullout strength of standard vs. cement-augmented rotator cuff repair anchors in cadaveric bone.标准型与骨水泥增强型肩袖修复锚钉在尸体骨中的拔出强度
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 May;54:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
A novel suture anchor constructed of cortical bone for rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on sheep humerus specimens.一种用于肩袖修复的由皮质骨构建的新型缝合锚钉:对绵羊肱骨标本的生物力学研究
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3185-4. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.肩袖和关节盂锚定物拔出强度的生物力学分析:2011 年更新。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jul;27(7):895-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.016.
6
Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.传统肩袖与全缝线锚钉的比较-在无限循环模型中关注置入角度的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225648. eCollection 2019.
7
Biomechanical Analysis of Medial-Row All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Pair-Matched Cadaveric Model.关节镜下单排全缝线锚钉修复肩袖撕裂的尸体配对模型生物力学分析
Arthroscopy. 2019 May;35(5):1370-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.023. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable sutureless screw anchor versus suture anchor fixation for rotator cuff repair.生物可吸收无缝线螺钉锚钉与缝线锚钉固定修复肩袖的生物力学比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Jan;21(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.020.
9
When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.
10
Anchored Transosseous-Equivalent Versus Anchorless Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis in a Cadaveric Model.锚定式类经骨与无锚定经骨肩袖修复术:尸体模型的生物力学分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;45(10):2364-2371. doi: 10.1177/0363546517706136. Epub 2017 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges Posed by Osteoporosis in Arthroscopy and Sports Injury Management.关节镜检查与运动损伤管理中骨质疏松症带来的挑战
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Jan 13;59(3):382-388. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01330-0. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术中缝线锚钉拔出的危险因素及相应处理
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 21;11(22):6870. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226870.
3
Comparison of two arthroscopic repair techniques for small-medium supraspinatus tendon tear: 1 triple-loaded vs 2 double-loaded metallic sutures anchors.
两种关节镜修复技术治疗中小型冈上肌腱撕裂的比较:1种三重加载与2种双重加载金属缝线锚钉
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 9;31:101950. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101950. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
3D-Printed Double-Helical Biodegradable Iron Suture Anchor: A Rabbit Rotator Cuff Tear Model.3D打印双螺旋可生物降解铁缝合锚钉:兔肩袖撕裂模型
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;15(8):2801. doi: 10.3390/ma15082801.
5
Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?磁共振成像能否准确可靠地测量肱骨皮质厚度?
JSES Int. 2021 Dec 11;6(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.010. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Mobility Assessment of the Supraspinatus in a Porcine Cadaver Model Using a Sensor-Enhanced, Arthroscopic Grasper.使用增强传感器的关节镜抓钳评估猪尸体模型的冈上肌活动度。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Feb;49(2):617-626. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02572-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model.羟磷灰石颗粒增强经皮椎弓根螺钉固定:一种骨质疏松骨模型的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223106. eCollection 2019.
8
When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.