• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。

When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7
PMID:31133036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6537218/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal insertion angle for suture anchor insertion has long been of great interest. Although greater tuberosity decortication is commonly performed during rotator cuff repair, the effect of decortication on the suture anchor insertion angle remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the pullout strength of threaded suture anchors inserted at 45° and 90° in decorticated and non-decorticated synthetic bone models.

METHODS

Two kinds of synthetic bones were used to simulate the decorticated and non-decorticated conditions, for which 40 metallic suture anchors were used. Anchors were inserted at 45° and 90° in both decorticated and non-decorticated models and tested under cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing. The number of completed cycles, ultimate failure load, and failure modes was recorded.

RESULTS

In the decorticated model, the ultimate failure load of anchors inserted at 45° (67.5 ± 5.3 N) was significantly lower than that of anchors inserted at 90° (114.1 ± 9.8 N) (p <  0.001). In the non-decorticated model, the ultimate failure load of anchors inserted at 45° (591.8 ± 58 N) was also significantly lower than that of anchors inserted at 90° (724.9 ± 94 N) (p = 0.003). Due to the diverse failure modes in the non-decorticated model, specimens with a failure mode of suture anchor pullout were analyzed in greater detail, with results showing a significantly larger pullout strength for anchors inserted at 90° (781.6 ± 53 N) than anchors inserted at 45° (648.0 ± 43 N) (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of decortication, the pullout strength of anchors inserted at 90° was greater than those inserted at 45°. The clinical relevance is that inserting suture anchors at 90° is recommended due to the significantly larger ultimate failure load in both decorticated and non-decorticated bones.

摘要

背景

缝线锚钉的最佳插入角度一直备受关注。虽然在肩袖修复过程中通常会进行更大结节的骨皮质剥离,但骨皮质剥离对缝线锚钉插入角度的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较在去皮质和非去皮质合成骨模型中以 45°和 90°插入带螺纹缝线锚钉的拔出强度。

方法

使用两种合成骨模拟去皮质和非去皮质条件,共使用 40 枚金属缝线锚钉。在去皮质和非去皮质模型中,以 45°和 90°的角度插入锚钉,并在循环加载后进行直至失效的测试。记录完成的循环次数、最终失效载荷和失效模式。

结果

在去皮质模型中,以 45°插入的锚钉的最终失效载荷(67.5±5.3 N)明显低于以 90°插入的锚钉(114.1±9.8 N)(p<0.001)。在非去皮质模型中,以 45°插入的锚钉的最终失效载荷(591.8±58 N)也明显低于以 90°插入的锚钉(724.9±94 N)(p=0.003)。由于非去皮质模型中的失效模式多样,因此更详细地分析了以缝线锚钉拔出为失效模式的标本,结果显示以 90°插入的锚钉的拔出强度(781.6±53 N)明显大于以 45°插入的锚钉(648.0±43 N)(p=0.025)。

结论

无论是否去皮质,以 90°插入的锚钉的拔出强度均大于以 45°插入的锚钉。临床意义在于,由于在去皮质和非去皮质骨中,最终失效载荷均明显更大,因此推荐以 90°插入缝线锚钉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5265/6537218/2da4d6189d3e/13018_2019_1209_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5265/6537218/55e783378627/13018_2019_1209_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5265/6537218/2da4d6189d3e/13018_2019_1209_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5265/6537218/55e783378627/13018_2019_1209_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5265/6537218/2da4d6189d3e/13018_2019_1209_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.
2
Suture Anchor Biomechanics After Rotator Cuff Footprint Decortication.肩袖足印区去皮质术后缝线锚钉的生物力学
Arthroscopy. 2016 Apr;32(4):544-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.034. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
3
Greater Tuberosity Decortication Decreases Load to Failure of All-Suture Anchor Constructs in Rotator Cuff Repair.大结节去皮质术降低全缝线锚定修复肩袖撕裂的失效负荷。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2777-2781. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
The effect of insertion angle on the pullout strength of threaded suture anchors: a validation of the deadman theory.插入角度对带螺纹缝线锚钉拔出强度的影响:“死人理论”的验证
Arthroscopy. 2014 Aug;30(8):900-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 May 29.
5
Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.传统肩袖与全缝线锚钉的比较-在无限循环模型中关注置入角度的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225648. eCollection 2019.
6
Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update.肩袖和盂唇锚定物的拔出强度的循环加载生物力学分析:2013 更新版。
Arthroscopy. 2013 May;29(5):832-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
7
Biomechanical study: determining the optimum insertion angle for screw-in suture anchors-is deadman's angle correct?生物力学研究:确定拧入式缝合锚钉的最佳插入角度——“死人角”是否正确?
Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
Pullout strength of standard vs. cement-augmented rotator cuff repair anchors in cadaveric bone.标准型与骨水泥增强型肩袖修复锚钉在尸体骨中的拔出强度
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 May;54:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
A biomechanical study on suture anchor insertion angle: Which is better, 90° or 45°?缝线锚钉植入角度的生物力学研究:90°还是45°更好?
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Pullout Strength of All-Suture Anchors: Effect of the Insertion and Traction Angle-A Biomechanical Study.全缝线锚钉拔出强度:进钉角度和牵引角度的影响——一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2784-2795. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of All-Suture Anchors and Metal Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Anchor Pullout Risk.关节镜下肩袖修补术中全缝线锚钉与金属锚钉的比较:短期临床疗效及锚钉拔出风险
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 11;14(8):2619. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082619.
2
Comparison of Biomechanical Failure Loads Between Tape-Type and Conventional Sutures in Internal Knotless Anchor-Based Constructs.基于无结内锚钉结构的带型缝线与传统缝线生物力学失效负荷的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Mar 24;10(3):23259671211072523. doi: 10.1177/23259671211072523. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of anchor threads on the pullout strength: A biomechanical study.锚定线对拔出强度的影响:一项生物力学研究。
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):878-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.008. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Treatment of primary total distal biceps tendon rupture using cortical button, transosseus fixation and suture anchor: A single center experience.采用皮质纽扣、经骨固定和缝线锚定治疗原发性全远端肱二头肌腱断裂:单中心经验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Oct;104(6):859-863. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
3
A Biomechanical Evaluation of Various Double Krackow Suture Techniques for Soft-Tissue Graft Fixation.
各种双 Krackow 缝线技术固定软组织移植物的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Mar;34(3):663-668. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.025. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
4
Minimum Distance of Suture Anchors Used for Rotator Cuff Repair Without Decreasing the Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Study.用于修复肩袖撕裂的缝合锚钉最小间距:一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
Effect of Footprint Preparation on Tendon-to-Bone Healing: A Histologic and Biomechanical Study in a Rat Rotator Cuff Repair Model.足底印迹制备对腱骨愈合的影响:一种大鼠肩袖修复模型的组织学和生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2017 Aug;33(8):1482-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
6
Efficacy of bone marrow-stimulating technique in rotator cuff repair.骨髓刺激技术在肩袖修复中的疗效
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1360-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
The influence of different footprint preparation techniques on tissue regeneration in rotator cuff repair in an animal model.不同足迹制备技术对动物模型肩袖修复中组织再生的影响。
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Mar 1;13(2):481-488. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.60581. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
8
The Effect of Suture Anchor Insertion Angle on Calcaneus Pullout Strength: Challenging the Deadman's Angle.缝合锚钉植入角度对跟骨拔出强度的影响:挑战传统角度。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Oct;10(5):411-414. doi: 10.1177/1938640016679705. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
A biomechanical study on suture anchor insertion angle: Which is better, 90° or 45°?缝线锚钉植入角度的生物力学研究:90°还是45°更好?
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Deadman theory revisited12.重温“死人理论”12 。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2016 Aug 12;27(2-3):171-81. doi: 10.3233/BME-161586.