TBS(骨小梁评分)作为一种骨折风险评估工具,与 DXA 和 FRAX 联合使用,可以补充常规临床实践中的评估方法。

The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice.

机构信息

Centre of Bone diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Avenue Pierre-Decker, 4, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

1st Department of Internal Medicine, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine in Bratislava, University Hospital, Bratislava, Staré Mesto, Bratislava, Slovakia.

出版信息

Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017 Dec;15(6):521-531. doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0410-z.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

There is an increasing body of evidence that the trabecular bone score (TBS), a surrogate of bone microarchitecture extracted from spine DXA, could play an important role in the management of patients with osteoporosis or at risk of fracture. The current paper reviews this published body of scientific literature on TBS and answers the most relevant clinical questions.

RECENT FINDINGS

TBS has repeatedly been proven to be predictive of fragility fractures, current and future, and this is largely independent of BMD, CRF, and the FRAX, and when used in conjunction with any one of these measures, it consistently enhances their accuracy. There also is a growing body of evidence indicating that the TBS has particular advantages over BMD for specific causes of increased fracture risk, like chronic corticosteroid excess, type-2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, and patients being treated with anti-aromatase and primary hyperparathyroidism, conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. TBS enhances performance of the FRAX tool, where its greatest utility appears to lie in its ability to accurately classify those patients whose BMD level lies close to the intervention threshold, aiding in decisions on whether treatment is warranted or not. Furthermore, TBS has also particular advantages over BMD in secondary osteoporosis. While the role of TBS with monitoring could be important as the different molecules impact logically TBS to various degrees, large clinical trials are still needed.

摘要

目的综述

越来越多的证据表明,从 DXA 脊柱中提取的骨微结构替代物——骨小梁骨密度(TBS),可能在骨质疏松症或骨折风险患者的管理中发挥重要作用。目前这篇综述文章对 TBS 的已发表科学文献进行了回顾,并回答了最相关的临床问题。

最新发现

TBS 已被反复证明可预测脆性骨折,包括当前和未来的骨折,且在很大程度上独立于 BMD、CRF 和 FRAX,当与其中任何一个指标联合使用时,可一致提高其准确性。越来越多的证据表明,对于某些导致骨折风险增加的特定原因,如慢性皮质激素过量、2 型糖尿病和慢性肾脏病,以及接受芳香化酶抑制剂和原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症治疗的患者,TBS 比 BMD 具有更大的优势,在这些情况下,BMD 读数往往具有误导性。TBS 可提高 FRAX 工具的性能,其最大的优势似乎在于能够准确地对 BMD 水平接近干预阈值的患者进行分类,有助于决定是否需要进行治疗。此外,TBS 在继发性骨质疏松症中也比 BMD 具有更大的优势。虽然 TBS 监测的作用可能很重要,因为不同的分子会在不同程度上逻辑地影响 TBS,但仍需要进行大型临床试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索