Boudry Christophe, Bouchard Aline
Normandie Université, UNICAEN, Média Normandie. Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen Cedex 5, France - Unité régionale de formation à l'information scientifique et technique (URFIST), École nationale des Chartes, Université de recherche Paris Sciences et Lettres, 17 rue des Bernardins, 75005 Paris, France - Laboratoire Dispositifs d'information et de communication à l'ère numérique (DICEN), EA7339, CNAM, 292 rue Saint Martin 75003 Paris, France.
Unité régionale de formation à l'information scientifique et technique (URFIST), École nationale des Chartes, Université de recherche Paris Sciences et Lettres, 17 rue des Bernardins, 75005 Paris, France.
Med Sci (Paris). 2017 Jun-Jul;33(6-7):647-652. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20173306023. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Over time, academic social networks are more and more used by researchers, especially thanks to the possibilities of sharing articles they offer. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the proportion, the typology (pre-print, post-print author/publisher) and the legality of the full-text publications deposited by researchers on ResearchGate which is widely used by the medical and biological community, using a sample of 1,500 randomly selected articles in PubMed and published between 2013 and 2015. To compare, the access to the full-text of the 1500 articles via PubMed and PubMed Central has been assessed, putting into evidence the important role ResearchGate plays for providing full-texts of articles in biology/medicine. It also puts academic social networks into perspective in relation to open-access repositories and open access.
随着时间的推移，学术社交网络越来越受到研究人员的使用，特别是因为它们提供了分享文章的可能性。本研究的目的是评估研究人员在广泛被医学和生物学界使用的ResearchGate上存放的全文出版物的比例、类型（预印本、作者/出版商后印本）和合法性，使用从PubMed中随机选择的1500篇在2013年至2015年期间发表的文章作为样本。为了进行比较，评估了通过PubMed和PubMed Central获取这1500篇文章全文的情况，凸显了ResearchGate在提供生物学/医学文章全文方面所起的重要作用。它还从开放获取知识库和开放获取的角度对学术社交网络进行了审视。
