• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加泰罗尼亚研究成果的开放获取可用性:以 CERCA 机构为例,2011-2015 年。

Open access availability of Catalonia research output: Case analysis of the CERCA institution, 2011-2015.

机构信息

Department of Librarianship, Information Science and Audiovisual Communication, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Research Center on Information, Communication and Culture, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216597. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0216597
PMID:31063473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6504106/
Abstract

The open access availability of publications by Catalonia's CERCA research centres was analysed to determine the extent to which authors use open access journals, repositories, social networks and other websites to disseminate their research results. A sample of 3,730 journal articles published by authors from CERCA research centres between 2011 and 2015 and available on Web of Science (out of a total output of 44,423) was analysed to identify how many were available in open access, full-text format. The results revealed that 75,8% of the total (2,828 articles) had at least one version available in open access, but just 52% (1,940 articles) had at least one version available in either journals (whether pure or hybrid open access journals or those with embargo periods) or repositories, a finding that highlights the powerful role played by academic social networks in the sharp increase in open access availability. Of the 2,828 articles for which at least one open access version was found, a total of 9,868 copies were located. With respect to versions, the publisher's final version, i.e. the type formatted for publication by journal publishers, was found in 75,3% of cases. The number of articles published in open access journals (567) was very close to the number of articles published in hybrid journals or journals with embargo periods (624). Only 40,4% of the articles in the sample were located in repositories, being the subject repositories the heaviest used. Fifty percent of the articles (1,881 publications) were posted on academic social networks, the most popular of which were ResearchGate and Academia. According to thematic areas, all six areas (science, life sciences, medical and health sciences, engineering and architecture and humanities) exceeded 70% of articles in open access.

摘要

对加泰罗尼亚 CERCA 研究中心出版的文献的开放获取可用性进行了分析,以确定作者在多大程度上使用开放获取期刊、存储库、社交网络和其他网站来传播他们的研究成果。对 2011 年至 2015 年间 CERCA 研究中心作者发表的 3730 篇期刊文章(在总共 44423 篇文章中)进行了分析,以确定有多少以开放获取的全文格式提供。结果显示,75.8%的文章(2828 篇)至少有一种开放获取版本,但只有 52%(1940 篇)至少有一种在期刊(无论是纯开放获取期刊还是混合开放获取期刊或有 embargo 期的期刊)或存储库中提供的版本,这一发现突显了学术社交网络在开放获取可用性急剧增加方面发挥的强大作用。在所找到的 2828 篇至少有一种开放获取版本的文章中,总共找到了 9868 份副本。关于版本,发现出版商的最终版本(即期刊出版商排版用于出版的类型)占 75.3%。开放获取期刊(567 篇)发表的文章数量非常接近混合期刊或有 embargo 期期刊(624 篇)发表的文章数量。样本中只有 40.4%的文章位于存储库中,其中主题存储库使用最多。50%的文章(1881 篇)被发布在学术社交网络上,其中最受欢迎的是 ResearchGate 和 Academia。根据主题领域,所有六个领域(科学、生命科学、医学和健康科学、工程和建筑以及人文科学)的开放获取文章比例都超过了 70%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7178/6504106/60e1842a7b0e/pone.0216597.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7178/6504106/60e1842a7b0e/pone.0216597.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7178/6504106/60e1842a7b0e/pone.0216597.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Open access availability of Catalonia research output: Case analysis of the CERCA institution, 2011-2015.加泰罗尼亚研究成果的开放获取可用性:以 CERCA 机构为例,2011-2015 年。
PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216597. eCollection 2019.
2
Status of open access in the biomedical field in 2005.2005年生物医学领域的开放获取状况。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):4-11. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.002.
3
Open access of publications by veterinary faculty in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大兽医学院教员出版物的开放获取情况。
J Vet Med Educ. 2011 Spring;38(1):33-41. doi: 10.3138/jvme.38.1.33.
4
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
5
Does open access in ophthalmology affect how articles are subsequently cited in research?眼科领域的开放获取会影响文章随后在研究中的被引用方式吗?
Ophthalmology. 2009 Aug;116(8):1425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.052. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
6
Open Access and Institutional Repositories: How Should Subscription Journals Respond?开放获取与机构知识库:订阅期刊应如何应对?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):235-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15078.
7
The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals.同行评议矫形外科期刊中引用不佳文章的增长。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1727-1735. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000727.
8
State of open science in cancer research.癌症研究中的开放科学现状。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2457-2465. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03468-7. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
9
Electronic publishing and Acupuncture in Medicine.电子出版与《医学中的针灸》
Acupunct Med. 2006 Sep;24(3):123-8. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.3.123.
10
Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges.科学文章的开放获取:益处与挑战综述
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring the transition to open access through its mode of implementation: A principal component analysis of two surveys.通过实施方式监测向开放获取的转变:对两项调查的主成分分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 11;17(7):e0271215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271215. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.
2
Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry.开放获取:牙科学利益相关者的概念、发现和建议。
J Dent. 2017 Sep;64:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
3
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure.
开放获取出版的剖析:纵向发展与内部结构研究。
BMC Med. 2012 Oct 22;10:124. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-124.
4
The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009.开放获取期刊出版的发展:1993 年至 2009 年。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020961. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
5
Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.开放获取科学期刊文献:2009 年状况
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273.