Internal Medicine Department, Puerta de Hierro Research Institute and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
J Med Virol. 2018 Mar;90(3):532-536. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24971. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
Oral DAA have demonstrated high efficacy as treatment of hepatitis C. However, the presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) at baseline has occasionally been associated with impaired treatment response. Herein, we examined the impact of baseline RAS at the HCV NS5A gene region on treatment response in a real-life setting. All hepatitis C patients treated with DAA including NS5A inhibitors at our institution were retrospectively examined. The virus NS5A gene was analyzed using population sequencing at baseline and after 24 weeks of completing therapy in all patients that failed. All changes recorded at positions 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 58, 62, 92, and 93 were considered. A total of 166 patients were analyzed. HCV genotypes were as follows: G1a (31.9%), G1b (48.2%), G3 (10.2%), and G4 (9.6%). Overall, 69 (41.6%) patients were coinfected with HIV and 46.7% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3-F4). Sixty (36.1%) patients had at least one RAS at baseline, including M28A/G/T (5), Q30X (12), L31I/F/M/V (6), T58P/S (25), Q/E62D (1), A92 K (7), and Y93C/H (15). Overall, 4.8% had two or more RAS, being more frequent in G4 (12.5%) followed by G1b (6.3%) and G1a (1.9%). Of 10 (6%) patients that failed DAA therapy, five had baseline NS5A RAS. No association was found for specific baseline RAS, although changes at position 30 were more frequent in failures than cures (22.2% vs 6.4%, P = 0.074). Moreover, the presence of two or more RAS at baseline was more frequent in failures (HR: 7.2; P = 0.029). Upon failure, six patients showed emerging RAS, including Q30C/H/R (3), L31M (1), and Y93C/H (2). Baseline NS5A RAS are frequently seen in DAA-naïve HCV patients. Two or more baseline NS5A RAS were found in nearly 5% and were significantly associated to DAA failure. Therefore, baseline NS5A testing should be considered when HCV treatment is planned with NS5A inhibitors.
口服 DAA 已被证明是治疗丙型肝炎的高效方法。然而,基线时存在耐药相关取代(RAS)偶尔与治疗反应受损有关。在此,我们在真实环境中研究了丙型肝炎病毒 NS5A 基因区域的基线 RAS 对治疗反应的影响。我们回顾性检查了我院接受 DAA 治疗(包括 NS5A 抑制剂)的所有丙型肝炎患者。所有患者在治疗 24 周后失败时均采用群体测序分析病毒 NS5A 基因。所有记录在位置 28、29、30、31、32、58、62、92 和 93 的变化均被认为是 RAS。共分析了 166 例患者。丙型肝炎基因型如下:G1a(31.9%)、G1b(48.2%)、G3(10.2%)和 G4(9.6%)。总体而言,69 例(41.6%)患者合并 HIV 感染,46.7%患者存在晚期肝纤维化(Metavir F3-F4)。60 例(36.1%)患者基线时有至少一种 RAS,包括 M28A/G/T(5)、Q30X(12)、L31I/F/M/V(6)、T58P/S(25)、Q/E62D(1)、A92 K(7)和 Y93C/H(15)。总体而言,4.8%的患者有两种或更多 RAS,G4(12.5%)比 G1b(6.3%)和 G1a(1.9%)更常见。在 10 例(6%)DAA 治疗失败的患者中,5 例患者基线时存在 NS5A RAS。尽管位置 30 的变化在失败病例中比治愈病例更常见(22.2%比 6.4%,P=0.074),但未发现特定的基线 RAS 与疗效相关。此外,基线时存在两种或更多 RAS 的患者失败率更高(HR:7.2;P=0.029)。失败后,6 例患者出现新发 RAS,包括 Q30C/H/R(3)、L31M(1)和 Y93C/H(2)。DAA 初治丙型肝炎病毒患者中经常出现基线 NS5A RAS。近 5%的患者存在两种或更多的基线 NS5A RAS,与 DAA 失败显著相关。因此,当计划使用 NS5A 抑制剂治疗丙型肝炎时,应考虑进行基线 NS5A 检测。