Wang Hao, Kline Jeffrey A, Jackson Bradford E, Robinson Richard D, Sullivan Matthew, Holmes Marcus, Watson Katherine A, Cowden Chad D, Phillips Jessica Laureano, Schrader Chet D, Leuck JoAnna, Zenarosa Nestor R
Department of Emergency Medicine, Integrative Emergency Services, John Peter Smith Health Network, 1500S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 640 Eskenazi Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):722-727. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx097.
To evaluate the associations between real-time overall patient satisfaction and Emergency Department (ED) crowding as determined by patient percepton and crowding estimation tool score in a high-volume ED.
A prospective observational study.
A tertiary acute hospital ED and a Level 1 trauma center.
ED patients.
INTERVENTION(S): Crowding status was measured by two crowding tools [National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) and Severely overcrowded-Overcrowded-Not overcrowded Estimation Tool (SONET)] and patient perception of crowding surveys administered at discharge.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): ED crowding and patient real-time satisfaction.
From 29 November 2015 through 11 January 2016, we enrolled 1345 participants. We observed considerable agreement between the NEDOCS and SONET assessment of ED crowding (bias = 0.22; 95% limits of agreement (LOAs): -1.67, 2.12). However, agreement was more variable between patient perceptions of ED crowding with NEDOCS (bias = 0.62; 95% LOA: -5.85, 7.09) and SONET (bias = 0.40; 95% LOA: -5.81, 6.61). Compared to not overcrowded, there were overall inverse associations between ED overcrowding and patient satisfaction (Patient perception OR = 0.49, 95% confidence limit (CL): 0.38, 0.63; NEDOCS OR = 0.78, 95% CL: 0.65, 0.95; SONET OR = 0.82, 95% CL: 0.69, 0.98).
While heterogeneity exists in the degree of agreement between objective and patient perceived assessments of ED crowding, in our study we observed that higher degrees of ED crowding at admission might be associated with lower real-time patient satisfaction.
通过患者感知和拥挤度评估工具评分,评估一家大型急诊科中实时总体患者满意度与急诊科拥挤之间的关联。
一项前瞻性观察性研究。
一家三级急症医院急诊科及一级创伤中心。
急诊科患者。
采用两种拥挤度评估工具[国家急诊科过度拥挤量表(NEDOCS)和严重拥挤-拥挤-不拥挤评估工具(SONET)]以及出院时进行的患者拥挤度感知调查来测量拥挤状态。
急诊科拥挤情况和患者实时满意度。
2015年11月29日至2016年1月11日,我们招募了1345名参与者。我们观察到NEDOCS和SONET对急诊科拥挤情况的评估之间存在相当程度的一致性(偏差=0.22;95%一致性界限(LOA):-1.67,2.12)。然而,患者对急诊科拥挤情况的感知与NEDOCS(偏差=0.62;95%LOA:-5.85,7.09)和SONET(偏差=0.40;95%LOA:-5.81,6.61)之间的一致性变化更大。与不拥挤相比,急诊科拥挤与患者满意度之间总体呈负相关(患者感知OR=0.49,95%置信区间(CL):0.38,0.63;NEDOCS OR=0.78,95%CL:0.65,0.95;SONET OR=0.82,95%CL:0.69,0.98)。
虽然急诊科拥挤的客观评估与患者感知评估之间的一致程度存在异质性,但在我们的研究中,我们观察到入院时急诊科拥挤程度较高可能与患者实时满意度较低有关。