• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意:倾向得分匹配法不能解决因删失导致的偏差。

Cautionary note: propensity score matching does not account for bias due to censoring.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):914-916. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx198.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfx198
PMID:28992275
Abstract

This article gives a review of the limitations of propensity score matching as a tool for confounding control in the presence of censoring. Using an illustrative simulation study, we emphasize the importance of explicit adjustment for selective loss to follow-up and explain how this may be achieved.

摘要

本文回顾了在存在删失的情况下,倾向评分匹配作为混杂控制工具的局限性。通过一个说明性的模拟研究,我们强调了明确调整选择性随访丢失的重要性,并解释了如何实现这一点。

相似文献

1
Cautionary note: propensity score matching does not account for bias due to censoring.注意:倾向得分匹配法不能解决因删失导致的偏差。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):914-916. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx198.
2
Covariate adjustment using propensity scores for dependent censoring problems in the accelerated failure time model.使用倾向评分对加速失效时间模型中相依删失问题进行协变量调整。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):390-404. doi: 10.1002/sim.7513. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.具有众多协变量和较少结局的研究:选择协变量并实施基于倾向评分的混杂调整。
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):268-78. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000069.
4
Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.双重稳健估计在倾向评分匹配分析中校正偏差的能力比较。一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1513-1519. doi: 10.1002/pds.4325. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in Observational Studies of Treatment Effect.倾向得分法在治疗效果观察性研究中减少偏倚的应用
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018 May;44(2):203-213. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.002.
6
A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research.倾向得分方法及其在心血管研究中的应用综述
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Feb;32(2):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 May 23.
7
A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.一种基于倾向评分的精细分层方法,用于在暴露不频繁时进行混杂因素调整。
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):249-257. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000595.
8
Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.利用敏感性分析解决未观察到的混杂因素对倾向评分法中协变量测量误差的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 1;187(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx248.
9
Optimal matching ratios in drug safety surveillance.药物安全监测中的最佳匹配率
Epidemiology. 2014 Sep;25(5):772-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000148.
10
Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.倾向评分方法及其在肾脏病学研究中的应用。
J Nephrol. 2011 May-Jun;24(3):256-62. doi: 10.5301/JN.2011.6429.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Hospitalization Outcomes Between Peritoneal Dialysis and Home Hemodialysis Patients by Sex and Race.按性别和种族比较腹膜透析与家庭血液透析患者的住院结局
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Feb 26;10(5):1548-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.02.012. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Can Elderly Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Gain Survival Advantages Through More Radical Surgeries? A SEER-Based Analysis.老年胰腺癌患者能否通过更积极的手术获得生存优势?一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的分析。
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 29;10:598048. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598048. eCollection 2020.
3
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对冠状动脉疾病合并2型糖尿病患者临床结局的预测作用:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 May 19;16:437-443. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S244623. eCollection 2020.
4
Interpretation and Impact of Real-World Clinical Data for the Practicing Clinician.真实世界临床数据对临床医生的解读和影响。
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1763-1774. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y. Epub 2018 Oct 24.