Kuroda Akio, Taniguchi Satoshi, Akehi Yuko, Mori Hiroyasu, Tamaki Motoyuki, Suzuki Reiko, Otsuka Yinhua, Matsuhisa Munehide
1 Diabetes Therapeutics and Research Center, Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1096-1100. doi: 10.1177/1932296817735122. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
Glucose values of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have time delays compared with plasma glucose (PG) values. The artificial pancreas (STG-55, Nikkiso, Japan) (AP), which measures venous blood glucose directly, also has a time delay because of the long tubing lines from sampling vessel to the glucose sensor. We investigate accuracy and time delay of CGM and AP in comparison with PG values during 2-step glucose clamp study.
Seven patients with type 2 diabetes and 2 healthy volunteers were included in this study. CGM (Enlite sensor, Medtronic, Northridge, CA, USA) was attached on the day before the experiment. Hyperglycemic (200 mg/dL) clamp was performed for 90 minutes, followed by euglycemic (100 mg/dL) hyperinsulinemic (100 μU/mL) clamp for 90-120 minutes using AP. CGM sensor glucose was calibrated just before and after the clamp study. AP and CGM values were compared with PG values.
AP values were significantly lower than PG values at 5, 30 minute during hyperglycemic clamp. In comparison, CGM value at 0 minute was significantly higher, and its following values were almost significantly lower than PG values. The time delay of AP and CGM values to reach maximum glucose levels were 5.0 ± 22.3 (NS) and 28.6 ± 32.5 ( P < .05) min, respectively. Mean absolute rate difference of CGM was significantly higher than AP (24.0 ± 7.6 vs 15.3 ± 4.6, P < .05) during glucose rising period (0-45 min); however, there were no significant differences during other periods.
Both CGM and AP failed to follow plasma glucose values during nonphysiologically rapid glucose rising, but indicated accurate values during physiological glucose change.
连续血糖监测(CGM)的血糖值与血浆葡萄糖(PG)值相比存在时间延迟。直接测量静脉血糖的人工胰腺(STG - 55,日本日机装公司)(AP),由于从采样容器到葡萄糖传感器的管路较长,也存在时间延迟。我们在两步葡萄糖钳夹研究中,比较CGM和AP与PG值的准确性和时间延迟。
本研究纳入7例2型糖尿病患者和2名健康志愿者。实验前一天佩戴CGM(美国美敦力公司,加利福尼亚州北岭,Enlite传感器)。进行90分钟的高血糖(200 mg/dL)钳夹,随后使用AP进行90 - 120分钟的正常血糖(100 mg/dL)高胰岛素血症(100 μU/mL)钳夹。在钳夹研究前后对CGM传感器葡萄糖进行校准。将AP和CGM值与PG值进行比较。
在高血糖钳夹期间的5分钟、30分钟时,AP值显著低于PG值。相比之下,CGM在0分钟时的值显著更高,其随后的值几乎均显著低于PG值。AP和CGM值达到最大血糖水平的时间延迟分别为5.0±22.3(无统计学意义)和28.6±32.5(P<.05)分钟。在血糖上升期(0 - 45分钟),CGM的平均绝对变化率显著高于AP(24.0±7.6对15.3±4.6,P<.05);然而,在其他时间段无显著差异。
在非生理性快速血糖上升期间,CGM和AP均未能跟踪血浆葡萄糖值,但在生理性血糖变化期间显示出准确的值。