Suppr超能文献

颈源性头晕患者管理中的临床决策:病例系列

Clinical Decision Making in the Management of Patients With Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Case Series.

作者信息

Jung Francis C, Mathew Sherin, Littmann Andrew E, MacDonald Cameron W

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Nov;47(11):874-884. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7425. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Abstract

Study Design Case series. Background Although growing recognition of cervicogenic dizziness (CGD) is emerging, there is still no gold standard for the diagnosis of CGD. The purpose of this case series is to describe the clinical decision making utilized in the management of 7 patients presenting with CGD. Case Description Patients presenting with neck pain and accompanying subjective symptoms, including dizziness, unsteadiness, light-headedness, and visual disturbance, were selected. Clinical evidence of a temporal relationship between neck pain and dizziness, with or without sensorimotor disturbances, was assessed. Clinical decision making followed a 4-step process, informed by the current available best evidence. Outcome measures included the numeric rating scale for dizziness and neck pain, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and global rating of change. Outcomes Seven patients (mean age, 57 years; range, 31-86 years; 7 female) completed physical therapy management at an average of 13 sessions (range, 8-30 sessions) over a mean of 7 weeks. Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the numeric rating scale for dizziness (mean difference, 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0, 7.5), neck pain (mean difference, 5.4; 95% CI: 3.8, 7.1), and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (mean difference, 32.6; 95% CI: 12.9, 52.2) at discontinuation. Patients also demonstrated overall satisfaction via the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (mean difference, 9) and global rating of change (mean, +6). Discussion This case series describes the physical therapist decision making, management, and outcomes in patients with CGD. Further investigation is warranted to develop a valid clinical decision-making guideline to inform management of patients with CGD. Level of Evidence Diagnosis, therapy, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(11):874-884. Epub 9 Oct 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7425.

摘要

研究设计

病例系列。背景:尽管对颈源性头晕(CGD)的认识日益增加,但CGD的诊断仍没有金标准。本病例系列的目的是描述在管理7例CGD患者时所采用的临床决策。病例描述:选择出现颈部疼痛并伴有主观症状(包括头晕、不稳、头晕目眩和视觉障碍)的患者。评估颈部疼痛与头晕之间是否存在时间关系的临床证据,无论是否伴有感觉运动障碍。临床决策遵循一个4步流程,以当前可得的最佳证据为依据。结局指标包括头晕和颈部疼痛的数字评定量表、头晕残障量表、患者特定功能量表以及整体变化评定。结果:7例患者(平均年龄57岁;范围31 - 86岁;7例女性)平均在7周内完成了13次(范围8 - 30次)物理治疗管理。在治疗结束时,头晕数字评定量表(平均差异5.7;95%置信区间[CI]:4.0,7.5)、颈部疼痛(平均差异5.4;95% CI:3.8,7.1)和头晕残障量表(平均差异32.6;95% CI:12.9,52.2)均观察到有临床意义的改善。患者通过患者特定功能量表(平均差异9)和整体变化评定(平均,+6)也表现出总体满意度。讨论:本病例系列描述了物理治疗师对CGD患者的决策、管理及结果。有必要进行进一步研究以制定有效的临床决策指南,为CGD患者的管理提供依据。证据水平:诊断、治疗,4级。《骨科与运动物理治疗杂志》2017年;47(11):874 - 884。2017年10月9日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7425 。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验