• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术与翻修全髋关节置换术的相对价值单位补偿是否合理?

Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.019
PMID:28993077
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relative value units (RVUs) are used to evaluate the effort required for providing a service to patients in order to determine compensation. Thus, more complicated cases, like revision arthroplasty cases, should yield a greater compensation. However, there are limited data comparing RVUs to the time required to complete the service. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the (1) mean RVUs, (2) mean operative times, and (3) mean RVU/minute between primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and (4) perform an individualized idealized surgeon annual cost difference analysis.

METHODS

A total of 103,702 patients who underwent primary (current procedural terminology code 27130) and 7273 patients who underwent revision THA (current procedural terminology code 27134) were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Mean RVUs, operative times (minutes), and RVU/minute were calculated and compared using Student t-test. Dollar amount per minute, per case, per day, and year was calculated to find an individualized idealized surgeon annual cost difference.

RESULTS

The mean RVU was 21.24 ± 0.53 (range, 20.72-21.79) for primary and 30.27 ± 0.03 (range, 30.13-30.28) for revision THA (P < .001). The mean operative time for primary THA was 94 ± 38 minutes (range, 30-480 minutes) and 152 ± 75 minutes (range, 30-475 minutes) for revision THA (P < .001). The mean RVU/minute was 0.260 ± 0.10 (range, 0.04-0.73) for primary and 0.249 ± 0.12 (range, 0.06-1.0) for revision cases (P < .001). The dollar amounts calculated for primary vs revision THA were as follows: per minute ($9.33 vs $8.93), per case ($877.12 vs $1358.32), per day ($6139.84 vs $5433.26), and a projected $113,052.28 annual cost difference for an individual surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Maximizing the RVU/minute provides the greatest "hourly rate." The RVU/minute for primary (0.260) being significantly greater than revision THA (0.249) and an annualized $113,052.28 cost difference reveal that although revision THAs are more complex cases requiring longer operative time, greater technical skill, and aftercare, compensation per time is not greater.

摘要

背景

相对价值单位(RVU)用于评估为患者提供服务所需的工作量,以确定补偿。因此,更复杂的病例,如翻修关节置换术病例,应该获得更高的补偿。然而,比较 RVU 与完成服务所需时间的数据有限。因此,本研究的目的是比较(1)原发性和(2)翻修性全髋关节置换术(THA)的(a)平均 RVU、(b)平均手术时间和(c)平均 RVU/分钟,并(d)进行个体化理想化医生年度成本差异分析。

方法

使用国家手术质量改进计划数据库,确定了 103702 例原发性(当前程序术语代码 27130)和 7273 例翻修性 THA(当前程序术语代码 27134)患者。使用学生 t 检验计算和比较平均 RVU、手术时间(分钟)和 RVU/分钟。每分钟、每例、每天和每年的美元金额被计算出来,以发现个体化理想化医生年度成本差异。

结果

原发性 THA 的平均 RVU 为 21.24±0.53(范围,20.72-21.79),翻修性 THA 的平均 RVU 为 30.27±0.03(范围,30.13-30.28)(P<0.001)。原发性 THA 的平均手术时间为 94±38 分钟(范围,30-480 分钟),翻修性 THA 的平均手术时间为 152±75 分钟(范围,30-475 分钟)(P<0.001)。原发性和翻修性病例的平均 RVU/分钟分别为 0.260±0.10(范围,0.04-0.73)和 0.249±0.12(范围,0.06-1.0)(P<0.001)。原发性与翻修性 THA 的计算美元金额如下:每分钟(9.33 美元与 8.93 美元)、每例(877.12 美元与 1358.32 美元)、每天(6139.84 美元与 5433.26 美元)和个体医生的年度成本差异预计为 113052.28 美元。

结论

最大限度地提高 RVU/分钟可提供最高“时薪”。原发性(0.260)的 RVU/分钟明显大于翻修性 THA(0.249),且每年的 113052.28 美元的成本差异表明,尽管翻修性 THA 是更复杂的病例,需要更长的手术时间、更高的技术技能和后续护理,但补偿时间并不更长。

相似文献

1
Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术与翻修全髋关节置换术的相对价值单位补偿是否合理?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
2
A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术与翻修全膝关节置换术的相对价值单位比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S39-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.070. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
3
A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary versus Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty.初次与翻修全踝关节置换术中相对价值单位的比较
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Dec 22;31:322-326.
4
Barriers to Revision Total Hip Service Lines: A Surgeon's Perspective Through a Deterministic Financial Model.翻修全髋关节服务线的障碍:通过确定性财务模型的外科医生视角。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1657-1666. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001273.
5
What provides a better value for your time? The use of relative value units to compare posterior segmental instrumentation of vertebral segments.哪种方法更能节省时间?使用相对价值单位比较脊柱节段的后节段器械置入。
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1727-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?并非所有初次全髋关节置换术都是一样的,那么在报销方面有差异吗?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Feb;7(4):74. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.14.
7
Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty.工作相关值单位不能充分支持膝关节翻修术中感染管理的负担。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):230-236. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00776.
8
A comparison of relative value units in revision hip versus revision knee arthroplasty.髋关节翻修术与膝关节翻修术相对价值单位的比较。
J Orthop. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.12.010. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
9
Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units.基于相对价值单位对腰椎椎间融合手术的后路与前路手术方法的比较。
Surg Technol Int. 2019 Nov 10;35:363-368.
10
A Retrospective Review of Reimbursement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Disparity Between Case Complexity and RVU Compensation.翻修全髋关节置换术报销的回顾性研究:病例复杂性与 RVU 补偿之间的差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S807-S813. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Appropriately Valued? Comparison of Reimbursement per Unit Time for Reconstructive versus Aesthetic Procedures.重建整形外科的价值是否得到合理评估?重建手术与美容手术每单位时间的报销费用比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 27;12(11):e6313. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006313. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for elective indications should have separate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.用于肱骨近端骨折的反肩关节置换术和用于择期适应证的反肩关节置换术应具有单独的现行程序编码(CPT)。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 May;34(5):1340-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.037. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
3
Comparison of cost and complications of primary total hip arthroplasty versus oncologic proximal femur replacement.
初次全髋关节置换术与肿瘤性股骨近端置换术的成本及并发症比较。
J Orthop. 2024 Sep 10;61:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.009. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Performing Revision Arthroplasty Increases Surgeon and Practice Volumes Through the Generation of Subsequent Cases: A Retrospective Study.通过产生后续病例来进行翻修关节成形术可增加外科医生的手术量和医疗机构的业务量:一项回顾性研究。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jun 17;28:101385. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101385. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Identification of Surgeon Outliers to Improve Cost Efficiency: A Novel Use of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Quality Payment Program.识别外科医生中的异常值以提高成本效率:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量支付计划的新用途。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Oct;39(10):2427-2432. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 9.
6
Comparison of Value per Operative Time between Primary and Revision Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.成人脊柱畸形初次手术与翻修手术每手术时间价值的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian Spine J. 2023 Jun;17(3):485-491. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0186. Epub 2023 May 15.
7
Advantages of robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty: a 90-day episode-of-care clinical utility and cost analysis.机器人手臂辅助全髋关节置换术的优势:90天护理期间的临床效用与成本分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 May 5;12(5):e220208. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0208.
8
Comparison of value per operative time between anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lumbar disc arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched analysis.腰椎前路椎间融合术与腰椎间盘置换术每手术时间的价值比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):427-431. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_99_22. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
Turnaround time and efficiency of pediatric outpatient brain magnetic resonance imaging: a multi-institutional cross-sectional study.儿科门诊脑磁共振成像的周转时间和效率:一项多机构横断面研究。
Pediatr Radiol. 2023 May;53(6):1144-1152. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05563-9. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
10
Are Foot & Ankle Surgeons Being Adequately Compensated for Ankle Fractures? - An Analysis of Relative Value Units.足部和踝关节外科医生对踝关节骨折的补偿是否足够?——相对价值单位分析。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 May-Jun;62(3):479-481. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 25.