Cilenti D, Solano A, Aranda C, Feldblum P J, Lamptey P R
Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988 Jun;26(3):409-12. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(88)90337-2.
An earlier analysis of 299 laparoscopic sterilizations comparing electrocoagulation and tubal ring occlusion techniques found no significant differences in rates of surgical complications. The risk of potentially serious complications, such as bowel/bladder burns, was considered higher with electrocoagulation be the preferred technique. Examination of the same women through 48 months poststerilization between the two techniques with respect to the incidence of gynecologic surgery performed subsequent to sterilization. Gynecologic abnormalities were similar for women in both groups. The rate of pregnancy was higher for tubal rings than for electrocoagulation (2.1 compared to 0.7 at 48 months) but this difference was not statistically significant.
一项较早的对299例腹腔镜绝育术的分析比较了电凝术和输卵管环扎术,结果发现手术并发症发生率无显著差异。电凝术导致肠道/膀胱灼伤等潜在严重并发症的风险被认为更高,因此输卵管环扎术成为首选技术。对采用这两种技术绝育后的相同女性进行了48个月的检查,比较绝育术后进行妇科手术的发生率。两组女性的妇科异常情况相似。输卵管环扎术的妊娠率高于电凝术(48个月时分别为2.1%和0.7%),但这种差异无统计学意义。