Verhoeff P M, Peters F P, Steigstra H, Hafkenscheid J C
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Radbound Hospital, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Chim Acta. 1988 Jul 15;175(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(88)90002-2.
In this paper we compare the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of gamma-glutamyltransferase with the non-carboxylated and the carboxylated substrate in preparations of different origin. Fresh human sera, commercial test sera and preparations of gamma-glutamyltransferase purified from human liver, porcine kidney and bovine kidney were used as sample materials. When assayed with both substrates preparations of gamma-glutamyltransferase from bovine kidney behaved in a different manner as did the enzyme in preparations from human liver or porcine kidney and the enzyme in fresh human sera. On account of the results obtained with both substrates we classified the commercial test sera for their enrichment using multi-inductive component analysis. The differences observed for the various methods of determination seem to have significance in quality control.
在本文中,我们比较了不同来源制剂中γ-谷氨酰转移酶催化活性浓度的测量,使用了未羧化和羧化的底物。新鲜人血清、商业测试血清以及从人肝脏、猪肾脏和牛肾脏中纯化的γ-谷氨酰转移酶制剂用作样本材料。当用两种底物进行测定时,来自牛肾脏的γ-谷氨酰转移酶制剂的表现与来自人肝脏或猪肾脏的制剂中的酶以及新鲜人血清中的酶不同。基于两种底物获得的结果,我们使用多归纳成分分析对商业测试血清进行了富集分类。各种测定方法中观察到的差异在质量控制方面似乎具有重要意义。