a Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
b Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
Subst Abus. 2018;39(2):239-246. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1389798. Epub 2018 May 16.
High dosage opioid use is a risk factor for opioid-related overdose commonly cited in guidelines, recommendations, and policies. In 2012, the Oregon Medicaid program developed a prior authorization policy for opioid prescriptions above 120 mg per day morphine equivalent dose (MED). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of that policy on utilization, prescribing patterns, and health outcomes.
Using administrative claims data from Oregon and a control state (Colorado) between 2011 and 2013, we used difference-in-differences analyses to examine changes in utilization, measures of high risk opioid use, and overdose after introduction of the policy. We also evaluated opioid utilization in a cohort of individuals who were high dosage opioid users before the policy.
Following implementation of Oregon's high dosage policy, the monthly probability of an opioid fill over 120 mg MED declined significantly by 1.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI]; -2.0% to -1.4%), whereas it increased significantly by 1.0 percentage points (95% CI 0.4% to 1.7%) for opioid fills < 61 mg MED. Fills of medications used to treat neuropathic pain also increased by 1.2 percentage points (95% CI 0.7% to 1.8%). The monthly probability of multiple pharmacy use declined by 0.1 percentage points (-0.2% to -0.0) following the prior authorization, but there were no significant changes in ED encounters or hospitalizations for opioid overdose. Among individuals who were using a high dosage opioid before the policy, there was a 20.3 percentage point (95% CI -15.3% to -25.3%) decline in estimated probability of having a high dosage fill after the policy.
Oregon's prior authorization policy was effective at reducing high dosage opioid prescriptions. While multiple pharmacy use also declined, we found no impact on opioid overdose were observed.
高剂量阿片类药物的使用是阿片类药物相关过量的风险因素,这在指南、建议和政策中经常被提及。2012 年,俄勒冈州医疗补助计划制定了一项针对每日吗啡当量剂量(MED)超过 120 毫克的阿片类药物处方的事先授权政策。本研究旨在评估该政策对利用、处方模式和健康结果的影响。
使用俄勒冈州和对照州(科罗拉多州)2011 年至 2013 年的行政索赔数据,我们使用差异中的差异分析来检查政策出台后利用、高危阿片类药物使用和过量的变化。我们还评估了政策出台前高剂量阿片类药物使用者队列中的阿片类药物利用情况。
在俄勒冈州高剂量政策实施后,每月超过 120 毫克 MED 的阿片类药物填充的概率显著下降了 1.7 个百分点(95%置信区间[CI];-2.0%至-1.4%),而每月低于 61 毫克 MED 的阿片类药物填充的概率则显著增加了 1.0 个百分点(95% CI 0.4%至 1.7%)。用于治疗神经病理性疼痛的药物的填充也增加了 1.2 个百分点(95% CI 0.7%至 1.8%)。在事先授权后,多药房使用的每月概率下降了 0.1 个百分点(-0.2%至-0.0),但急诊室就诊或因阿片类药物过量住院的情况没有明显变化。在政策出台前使用高剂量阿片类药物的个体中,政策出台后高剂量药物的填充估计概率下降了 20.3 个百分点(95% CI-15.3%至-25.3%)。
俄勒冈州的事先授权政策有效地减少了高剂量阿片类药物的处方。虽然多药房的使用也有所下降,但我们没有观察到阿片类药物过量的影响。