Suppr超能文献

糖尿病预防计划中的抑郁症状、抗抑郁药物使用与炎症标志物。

Depressive Symptoms, Antidepressant Medication Use, and Inflammatory Markers in the Diabetes Prevention Program.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine (de Groot, Mather), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Medicine, University of Arizona School of Medicine (Marrero), Tucson, Arizona; Biostatistics Center (Mele, Ma), George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (Doyle), Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois; Camden Clark Memorial Hospital (Schwartz), Parkersburg, West Virginia; University of Miami School of Medicine (Goldberg), Miami, Florida; Department of Family Medicine (Price), University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine and Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado; and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Knowler), Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2018 Feb/Mar;80(2):167-173. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000535.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Antidepressant medication use (ADM) has been shown to predict diabetes. This article assessed the role of inflammatory markers in this relationship within the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).

METHODS

DPP participants randomized to metformin (MET), life-style intervention (ILS), or placebo (PLB) were assessed for depression (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) annually, ADM use semiannually, serum inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin 6 [IL-6]) at baseline and year 1, and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) semiannually (for 3.2 years).

RESULTS

At baseline (N = 3187), M (SD) body mass index was 34 (6) kg/m and the median (interquartile range) BDI score was 3 (1-7). One hundred eighty-one (5.7%) reported ADM use and 328 (10%) had BDI scores of 11 or higher. CRP and IL-6 levels did not differ by treatment group. Baseline ADM, but not BDI score, was associated with higher levels of baseline CRP adjusted for demographic, anthropometric variables, and other medications (20% higher, p = .01). Year 1 CRP decreased for non-ADM users in the MET (-13.2%) and ILS (-34%) groups and ADM users in the ILS group (-29%). No associations were found with IL-6. CRP and continuous use of ADM predicted incident T2DM in the PLB group. In the ILS group, continuous and intermittent ADM, but not CRP, predicted T2DM. In the MET group, CRP predicted incident T2DM. CRP did not mediate the risk of T2DM with ADM use in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

ADM was significantly associated with elevated CRP and incident T2DM. In the PLB group, ADM and CRP independently predicted onset of T2DM; however, CRP did not significantly mediate the effect of ADM.

摘要

目的

抗抑郁药物的使用(ADM)已被证明可预测糖尿病。本文评估了炎症标志物在糖尿病预防计划(DPP)中对这种关系的作用。

方法

对接受二甲双胍(MET)、生活方式干预(ILS)或安慰剂(PLB)随机分组的 DPP 参与者每年进行一次抑郁评估(贝克抑郁量表[BDI]),每半年评估一次 ADM 使用情况,在基线和第 1 年评估血清炎症标志物(C 反应蛋白[CRP]、白细胞介素 6 [IL-6]),每半年评估一次 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的诊断(持续 3.2 年)。

结果

在基线(N=3187)时,M(SD)体重指数为 34(6)kg/m,BDI 评分中位数(四分位间距)为 3(1-7)。181(5.7%)例报告使用 ADM,328(10%)例 BDI 评分≥11。CRP 和 IL-6 水平在治疗组之间没有差异。基线 ADM,但不是 BDI 评分,与调整人口统计学、人体测量学变量和其他药物后的基线 CRP 水平相关(高 20%,p=0.01)。非 ADM 使用者的 MET(-13.2%)和 ILS(-34%)组以及 ILS 组的 ADM 使用者的 CRP 水平在第 1 年下降。未发现与 IL-6 相关。CRP 和连续使用 ADM 可预测 PLB 组的 T2DM 事件。在 ILS 组中,连续和间歇性 ADM,但不是 CRP,可预测 T2DM。在 MET 组中,CRP 预测 T2DM 事件。在任何一组中,CRP 均不能介导 ADM 与 T2DM 之间的风险。

结论

ADM 与 CRP 升高和 T2DM 显著相关。在 PLB 组中,ADM 和 CRP 独立预测 T2DM 的发病;然而,CRP 并未显著介导 ADM 的作用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验