Rubin Richard R, Knowler William C, Ma Yong, Marrero David G, Edelstein Sharon L, Walker Elizabeth A, Garfield Sanford A, Fisher Edwin B
Diabetes Prevention Program Coordinating Center, Biostatistics Center, 6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 750, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2005 Apr;28(4):830-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.4.830.
To assess depression markers (symptoms and antidepressant medicine use) in Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) participants and to determine whether changes in depression markers during the course of the study were associated with treatment arm, weight change, physical activity level, or participant demographic characteristics.
DPP participants (n = 3,187) in three treatment arms (intensive lifestyle, metformin, and placebo) completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and reported on use of antidepressant medicines at randomization and subsequently at each annual visit (average duration in study 3.2 years).
On study entry, 10.3% of participants had BDI scores > or =11, which was used as a threshold for mild depression, 5.7% took antidepressant medicines, and 0.9% had both depression markers. During the DPP, the proportion of participants with elevated BDI scores declined (from 10.3% at baseline to 8.4% at year 3), while the proportion taking antidepressant medicines increased (from 5.7% at baseline to 8.7% at year 3), leaving the proportion with either marker unchanged. These time trends were not significantly associated with the DPP treatment arm. Depression markers throughout the study were associated with some participant demographic factors, adjusted for other factors. Men were less likely to have elevated depression scores and less likely to use antidepressant medicine at baseline (9.0% of men and 17.9% of women had at least one marker of depression) and throughout the study (P <0.0001). Those with more education were less likely to have elevated symptom scores (P = 0.0007) but more likely to be taking antidepressant medicine (P = 0.002). Non-Hispanic white participants were less likely than African Americans to have BDI scores > or =11 (P = 0.03), but white participants were more likely to be taking antidepressant medicine than any other racial/ethnic group (P <0.0001).
DPP participation was not associated with changes in levels of depression. Countervailing trends in the proportion of DPP participants with elevated depression symptoms and the proportion taking antidepressant medicine resulted in no significant change in the proportion with either marker. The finding that those taking antidepressant medicine often do not have elevated depression symptoms indicates the value of assessing both markers when estimating overall depression rates.
评估糖尿病预防计划(DPP)参与者的抑郁标志物(症状及抗抑郁药物使用情况),并确定研究过程中抑郁标志物的变化是否与治疗组、体重变化、身体活动水平或参与者人口统计学特征相关。
DPP的三个治疗组(强化生活方式干预组、二甲双胍组和安慰剂组)的参与者(n = 3187)完成了贝克抑郁量表(BDI),并报告了随机分组时以及随后每次年度访视时(研究平均持续时间3.2年)的抗抑郁药物使用情况。
在研究开始时,10.3%的参与者BDI评分≥11,该评分被用作轻度抑郁的阈值,5.7%的参与者服用抗抑郁药物,0.9%的参与者同时具有这两种抑郁标志物。在DPP期间,BDI评分升高的参与者比例下降(从基线时的10.3%降至第3年时的8.4%),而服用抗抑郁药物的参与者比例增加(从基线时的5.7%升至第3年时的8.7%),两种标志物的比例均未改变。这些时间趋势与DPP治疗组无显著关联。在对其他因素进行调整后,整个研究过程中的抑郁标志物与一些参与者人口统计学因素相关。男性在基线时(9.0%的男性和17.9%的女性至少有一项抑郁标志物)及整个研究过程中抑郁评分升高的可能性较小且服用抗抑郁药物的可能性较小(P<0.0001)。受教育程度较高者症状评分升高的可能性较小(P = 0.0007),但服用抗抑郁药物的可能性较大(P = 0.002)。非西班牙裔白人参与者BDI评分≥11的可能性低于非裔美国人(P = 0.03),但白人参与者服用抗抑郁药物的可能性高于其他任何种族/族裔群体(P<0.0001)。
参与DPP与抑郁水平的变化无关。DPP中抑郁症状评分升高的参与者比例和服用抗抑郁药物的参与者比例呈相反趋势,导致两种标志物的比例均无显著变化。服用抗抑郁药物的人通常没有抑郁症状升高这一发现表明,在估计总体抑郁率时评估两种标志物的价值。