Suppr超能文献

量化美国人口动态统计数据和基于新闻媒体的数据源中与执法相关死亡事件的漏报情况:一种捕获再捕获分析。

Quantifying underreporting of law-enforcement-related deaths in United States vital statistics and news-media-based data sources: A capture-recapture analysis.

作者信息

Feldman Justin M, Gruskin Sofia, Coull Brent A, Krieger Nancy

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Program on Global Health and Human Rights, Institute for Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 10;14(10):e1002399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002399. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior research suggests that United States governmental sources documenting the number of law-enforcement-related deaths (i.e., fatalities due to injuries inflicted by law enforcement officers) undercount these incidents. The National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), administered by the federal government and based on state death certificate data, identifies such deaths by assigning them diagnostic codes corresponding to "legal intervention" in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10). Newer, nongovernmental databases track law-enforcement-related deaths by compiling news media reports and provide an opportunity to assess the magnitude and determinants of suspected NVSS underreporting. Our a priori hypotheses were that underreporting by the NVSS would exceed that by the news media sources, and that underreporting rates would be higher for decedents of color versus white, decedents in lower versus higher income counties, decedents killed by non-firearm (e.g., Taser) versus firearm mechanisms, and deaths recorded by a medical examiner versus coroner.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We created a new US-wide dataset by matching cases reported in a nongovernmental, news-media-based dataset produced by the newspaper The Guardian, The Counted, to identifiable NVSS mortality records for 2015. We conducted 2 main analyses for this cross-sectional study: (1) an estimate of the total number of deaths and the proportion unreported by each source using capture-recapture analysis and (2) an assessment of correlates of underreporting of law-enforcement-related deaths (demographic characteristics of the decedent, mechanism of death, death investigator type [medical examiner versus coroner], county median income, and county urbanicity) in the NVSS using multilevel logistic regression. We estimated that the total number of law-enforcement-related deaths in 2015 was 1,166 (95% CI: 1,153, 1,184). There were 599 deaths reported in The Counted only, 36 reported in the NVSS only, 487 reported in both lists, and an estimated 44 (95% CI: 31, 62) not reported in either source. The NVSS documented 44.9% (95% CI: 44.2%, 45.4%) of the total number of deaths, and The Counted documented 93.1% (95% CI: 91.7%, 94.2%). In a multivariable mixed-effects logistic model that controlled for all individual- and county-level covariates, decedents injured by non-firearm mechanisms had higher odds of underreporting in the NVSS than those injured by firearms (odds ratio [OR]: 68.2; 95% CI: 15.7, 297.5; p < 0.01), and underreporting was also more likely outside of the highest-income-quintile counties (OR for the lowest versus highest income quintile: 10.1; 95% CI: 2.4, 42.8; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of underreporting in the NVSS for deaths certified by coroners compared to medical examiners, and the odds of underreporting did not vary by race/ethnicity. One limitation of our analyses is that we were unable to examine the characteristics of cases that were unreported in The Counted.

CONCLUSIONS

The media-based source, The Counted, reported a considerably higher proportion of law-enforcement-related deaths than the NVSS, which failed to report a majority of these incidents. For the NVSS, rates of underreporting were higher in lower income counties and for decedents killed by non-firearm mechanisms. There was no evidence suggesting that underreporting varied by death investigator type (medical examiner versus coroner) or race/ethnicity.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,美国政府记录执法相关死亡人数(即执法人员造成伤害导致的死亡)的资料存在此类事件漏报情况。由联邦政府管理、基于各州死亡证明数据的国家生命统计系统(NVSS),根据《国际疾病分类第十版》(ICD - 10),通过为这些死亡分配对应“法律干预”的诊断代码来识别此类死亡。更新的非政府数据库通过汇编新闻媒体报道来追踪执法相关死亡情况,这为评估NVSS疑似漏报的规模和决定因素提供了机会。我们的先验假设是,NVSS的漏报率将超过新闻媒体来源,并且有色人种死者相对于白人死者、低收入县死者相对于高收入县死者、被非枪支(如泰瑟枪)致死的死者相对于被枪支致死的死者,以及由法医记录的死亡相对于由验尸官记录的死亡,其漏报率会更高。

方法与结果

我们通过将《卫报》旗下“被统计者”(The Counted)这个基于新闻媒体的非政府数据集中报告的案例与2015年NVSS可识别的死亡记录进行匹配,创建了一个新的全美数据集。针对这项横断面研究,我们进行了两项主要分析:(1)使用捕获 - 再捕获分析估计每个来源未报告的死亡总数和比例;(2)使用多水平逻辑回归评估NVSS中执法相关死亡漏报的相关因素(死者的人口统计学特征、死亡机制、死亡调查员类型[法医与验尸官]、县中位数收入以及县城市化程度)。我们估计2015年执法相关死亡总数为1166例(95%置信区间:1153, 1184)。“被统计者”仅报告了599例死亡,NVSS仅报告了36例,两份列表都报告的有487例,估计有44例(95%置信区间:31, 62)在两个来源中均未报告。NVSS记录了死亡总数的44.9%(95%置信区间:44.2%, 45.4%),“被统计者”记录了93.1%(95%置信区间:91.7%, 94.2%)。在一个控制了所有个体和县级协变量的多变量混合效应逻辑模型中,非枪支机制致伤的死者在NVSS中的漏报几率高于枪支致伤的死者(优势比[OR]:68.2;95%置信区间:15.7, 297.5;p < 0.01),并且在最高收入五分位数县以外的地区漏报也更有可能(最低收入五分位数与最高收入五分位数的OR:10.1;95%置信区间:2.4, 42.8;p < 0.01)。与法医认证的死亡相比,验尸官认证的死亡在NVSS中的漏报几率没有统计学上的显著差异,并且漏报几率也不因种族/族裔而有所不同。我们分析的一个局限性是,我们无法检查“被统计者”中未报告案例的特征。

结论

基于媒体的来源“被统计者”报告的执法相关死亡比例比NVSS高得多,NVSS未能报告这些事件中的大多数。对于NVSS,低收入县以及非枪支机制致死者的漏报率更高。没有证据表明漏报因死亡调查员类型(法医与验尸官)或种族/族裔而有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cf/5634537/3dc7ded76980/pmed.1002399.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验