Finch Brian Karl, Thomas Kyla, Beck Audrey N, Burghart D Brian, Klinger David, Johnson Richard R
Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
San Diego State University, San Diego, USA.
J Quant Criminol. 2022 Mar;38(1):267-293. doi: 10.1007/s10940-021-09493-x. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
The most widely used data set for studying police homicides-the Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) kept by the Federal Bureau of Investigation-is collected from a voluntary sample.
Using a journalist-curated database of police-related deaths, we find the SHR police homicide data to be substantially incomplete. This is due to both non-reporting and substantial under-reporting by agencies. Further, our inquiry discloses a pattern of error in identifying "victims" and "offenders" in the data, and finds that investigating agencies are often incorrectly listed as the responsible agency, which seriously jeopardizes police department-level analyses. Finally, there is evidence of sample bias such that the SHR data system is not representative of all police departments, nor is it representative of large police departments.
We conclude that the SHR data is of dubious value for assessing correlates of police homicides in the United States, as all analyses using it will reflect these widespread biases and significant undercounts. Analysis of SHR data for these purposes should cease.
用于研究警察杀人案的最广泛使用的数据集——联邦调查局保存的《补充杀人报告》(SHR)——是从一个自愿样本中收集的。
通过使用一个由记者整理的与警察相关死亡的数据库,我们发现SHR警察杀人案数据存在大量不完整的情况。这是由于各机构既不报告,也大量少报。此外,我们的调查揭示了数据中在识别“受害者”和“犯罪者”方面存在错误模式,并且发现调查机构经常被错误地列为责任机构,这严重危及了对警察部门层面的分析。最后,有证据表明存在样本偏差,以至于SHR数据系统既不能代表所有警察部门,也不能代表大型警察部门。
我们得出结论,SHR数据对于评估美国警察杀人案的相关因素价值存疑,因为所有使用该数据的分析都会反映这些普遍存在的偏差和严重的漏报情况。为此目的对SHR数据的分析应该停止。