Suppr超能文献

创伤后认知问卷在经历军事创伤后寻求治疗的退伍军人中的心理计量学评估。

A psychometric evaluation of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory with Veterans seeking treatment following military trauma exposure.

机构信息

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.048. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

Abstract

Trauma-related beliefs have salient relationships to the development and maintenance of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) following stress exposure. The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) has the potential to be a standard assessment of this critical construct. However, some critical aspects of validity and reliability appear to vary by population. To date, the PTCI has not been psychometrically evaluated for use with military-specific traumas such as combat and military sexual trauma (MST). Based on exploratory and confirmatory analyses with 949 Veterans seeking trauma-focused treatment for military traumas, we found a four factor model (negative view of the self, negative view of the world, self-blame, and negative beliefs about coping competence) provided the best fit. In contrast, the original three factor model was not confirmed. Both models demonstrated convergent and discriminative validity. Although gender was associated with PTCI total and factor scores, differences did not persist after controlling for trauma type. MST was associated with higher PTCI scores even when controlling for gender, though the clinical magnitude of these differences is likely negligible. Internal reliability validity was demonstrated with PTCI total and subscale scores.

摘要

创伤相关信念与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的发展和维持密切相关。创伤后认知清单(PTCI)有可能成为评估这一关键结构的标准。然而,有效性和可靠性的某些关键方面似乎因人群而异。迄今为止,PTCI 尚未针对战斗和军事性创伤等特定于军事的创伤进行心理测量评估。基于对 949 名寻求针对军事创伤的创伤聚焦治疗的退伍军人进行的探索性和验证性分析,我们发现四因素模型(自我负面看法、世界负面看法、自责和应对能力的负面信念)提供了最佳拟合。相比之下,原始的三因素模型没有得到证实。两个模型都表现出收敛和判别有效性。尽管性别与 PTCI 总分和因子得分相关,但在控制创伤类型后,差异并不持续。即使在控制性别后,MST 也与较高的 PTCI 分数相关,尽管这些差异的临床意义可能微不足道。PTCI 总分和子量表得分证明了内部信度有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验