Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):110-120. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix182.
Data on the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam and emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance during multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are limited.
We performed a retrospective study of 21 patients treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam for MDR-P. aeruginosa infections. Whole genome sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed on longitudinal isolates.
Median age was 58 years; 9 patients (43%) were transplant recipients. Median simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) was 26. Eighteen (86%) patients were treated for respiratory tract infections; others were treated for bloodstream, complicated intraabdominal infections, or complicated urinary tract infections. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was discontinued in 1 patient (rash). Thirty-day all-cause and attributable mortality rates were 10% (2/21) and 5% (1/21), respectively; corresponding 90-day mortality rates were 48% (10/21) and 19% (4/21). The ceftolozane-tazobactam failure rate was 29% (6/21). SAPS-II score was the sole predictor of failure. Ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance emerged in 3 (14%) patients. Resistance was associated with de novo mutations, rather than acquisition of resistant nosocomial isolates. ampC overexpression and mutations were identified as potential resistance determinants.
In this small study, ceftolozane-tazobactam was successful in treating 71% of patients with MDR-P. aeruginosa infections, most of whom had pneumonia. The emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in 3 patients is worrisome and may be mediated in part by AmpC-related mechanisms. More research on treatment responses and resistance during various types of MDR-P. aeruginosa infections is needed to define ceftolozane-tazobactam's place in the armamentarium.
关于多药耐药(MDR)铜绿假单胞菌感染期间使用头孢他啶-他唑巴坦和出现头孢他啶-他唑巴坦耐药的数据有限。
我们对 21 例接受头孢他啶-他唑巴坦治疗的 MDR 铜绿假单胞菌感染患者进行了回顾性研究。对纵向分离株进行全基因组测序和定量实时聚合酶链反应。
中位年龄为 58 岁;9 例(43%)为移植受者。简化急性生理学评分 II(SAPS-II)中位数为 26。18 例(86%)患者因呼吸道感染接受治疗;其他患者因血流感染、复杂腹腔内感染或复杂尿路感染接受治疗。1 例患者(皮疹)停用头孢他啶-他唑巴坦。30 天全因和归因死亡率分别为 10%(2/21)和 5%(1/21);相应的 90 天死亡率分别为 48%(10/21)和 19%(4/21)。头孢他啶-他唑巴坦失败率为 29%(6/21)。SAPS-II 评分是唯一的失败预测因子。3 例(14%)患者出现头孢他啶-他唑巴坦耐药。耐药与新出现的突变有关,而不是获得耐药的医院分离株。发现 ampC 过表达和突变是潜在的耐药决定因素。
在这项小型研究中,头孢他啶-他唑巴坦成功治疗了 71%的 MDR 铜绿假单胞菌感染患者,其中大多数患有肺炎。3 例患者出现头孢他啶-他唑巴坦耐药令人担忧,部分可能与 AmpC 相关机制有关。需要对各种类型的 MDR 铜绿假单胞菌感染期间的治疗反应和耐药性进行更多研究,以确定头孢他啶-他唑巴坦在治疗中的地位。