Sarpangala Mythri, Devasya Ashwin, George Ashford L, Kumara Ajeya, Panicker Prasanth, Mathew Minu
Department of Periodontology, Kannur Dental College, Kannur, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kannur Dental College, Kannur, India -
Minerva Stomatol. 2018 Feb;67(1):26-31. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.17.04052-3. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2%, 4% lignocaine, Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) mixture and precaine topical anesthetic agents (with 1:1,000,000 epinephrine) during the extraction of deciduous anterior tooth.
Eighty patients with preshedding mobility of deciduous anterior tooth were divided randomly into four groups. Lignocaine, in amount of 2% and 4%, precaine and EMLA topical anesthetic agents were applied and the tooth was extracted. VAS has been used to assess the subjective pain while Wong-Baker Faces Scale and SEM Pain Scale have been used to record the objective pain to check the efficacy of these topical anesthetic agents. SPSS ver.17 was used for statistical analysis. Group comparison was done by ANOVA (Fishers F test) and inter comparison was done by Tukeys t-test.
Based on the scoring criteria of VAS, SEM and Wong Bakers facial pain scales, precaine had best scores followed by EMLA mixture, 4% lignocaine, and then 2 % lignocaine during extraction of primary anterior teeth with preshedding mobility.
The efficacy of precaine was superior compared to EMLA mixture followed by 4% lignocaine and 2% Lignocaine respectively.
本研究旨在评估2%、4%利多卡因、复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)和丙美卡因局部麻醉剂(含1:1,000,000肾上腺素)在乳牙前牙拔除术中的疗效。
80例乳牙前牙有松动即将脱落的患者被随机分为四组。分别应用2%和4%的利多卡因、丙美卡因和复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)局部麻醉剂,然后拔除牙齿。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估主观疼痛,同时采用面部表情疼痛评分法(Wong-Baker Faces Scale)和面部疼痛分级评分法(SEM Pain Scale)记录客观疼痛,以检查这些局部麻醉剂的疗效。使用SPSS 17.0版进行统计分析。组间比较采用方差分析(Fisher F检验),组内比较采用Tukey t检验。
根据VAS、SEM和面部表情疼痛评分法的评分标准,在乳牙前牙有松动即将脱落的拔除术中,丙美卡因得分最高,其次是复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA)、4%利多卡因,然后是2%利多卡因。
丙美卡因的疗效优于复方利多卡因乳膏(EMLA),其次分别是4%利多卡因和2%利多卡因。