Rosskopf U, Daas A, Terao E, von Hunolstein C
Technical Assistance & Laboratory Services (TAL) Group, Regulatory Systems Strengthening (RSS) Team, Regulation of Medicines and Other Health Technologies (RHT) Unit, Essential Medicines and Health Products (EMP) Department, Health Systems and Innovation (HIS) Cluster, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), Department of Biological Standardisation, OMCL Network & HealthCare (DBO), Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.
Pharmeur Bio Sci Notes. 2017;2017:44-68.
Before release onto the market, it must be demonstrated that the total and free polysaccharide (poly ribosyl-ribitol-phosphate, PRP) content of type b (Hib) vaccine complies with requirements. However, manufacturers use different methods to assay PRP content: a national control laboratory must establish and validate the relevant manufacturer methodology before using it to determine PRP content. An international study was organised by the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe/European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) and of the European Union Commission, to verify the suitability of a single method for determining PRP content in liquid pentavalent vaccines (DTwP-HepB-Hib) containing a whole-cell pertussis component. It consists of HCl hydrolysis followed by chromatographic separation and quantification of ribitol on a CarboPac MA1 column using high-performance anion exchange chromatography coupled with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). The unconjugated, free, PRP is separated from the total PRP using C4 solid-phase extraction cartridges (SPE C4). Ten quality control laboratories performed two independent analyses applying the proposed analytical test protocol to five vaccine samples, including a vaccine lot with sub-potent PRP content and very high free PRP content. Both WHO PRP standard and ribitol reference standard were included as calibrating standards. A significant bias between WHO PRP standard and ribitol reference standard was observed. Study results showed that the proposed analytical method is, in principle, suitable for the intended use provided that a validation is performed as usually expected from quality control laboratories.
在投放市场之前,必须证明b型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)疫苗的总多糖和游离多糖(聚核糖基核糖醇磷酸,PRP)含量符合要求。然而,制造商使用不同的方法来测定PRP含量:国家控制实验室在使用制造商的相关方法来确定PRP含量之前,必须建立并验证该方法。世界卫生组织(WHO)与欧洲委员会/欧洲药品与医疗保健质量管理局(EDQM)及欧盟委员会的生物标准化计划(BSP)合作组织了一项国际研究,以验证一种单一方法用于测定含有全细胞百日咳成分的液体五价疫苗(DTwP-HepB-Hib)中PRP含量的适用性。该方法包括盐酸水解,随后进行色谱分离,并使用配备脉冲安培检测的高效阴离子交换色谱法(HPAEC-PAD)在CarboPac MA1柱上对核糖醇进行定量。使用C4固相萃取柱(SPE C4)将未结合的游离PRP与总PRP分离。十个质量控制实验室对五个疫苗样品应用提议的分析测试方案进行了两次独立分析,其中包括一批PRP含量低于标准且游离PRP含量非常高的疫苗。同时将WHO PRP标准品和核糖醇参考标准品作为校准标准品。观察到WHO PRP标准品和核糖醇参考标准品之间存在显著偏差。研究结果表明,只要按照质量控制实验室通常预期的那样进行验证,提议的分析方法原则上适用于预期用途。