• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于机器人辅助腹疝手术的全国性评估。

A nationwide evaluation of robotic ventral hernia surgery.

作者信息

Coakley Kathleen M, Sims Stephanie M, Prasad Tanushree, Lincourt Amy E, Augenstein Vedra A, Sing Ronald F, Heniford B Todd, Colavita Paul D

机构信息

Carolinas Medical Center, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Carolinas Medical Center, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):1158-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.022
PMID:29017732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair(RVHR) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair(LVHR).

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from October 2008 to December 2013 for ventral hernia repairs. Demographics, morbidity, mortality, and charges were compared between RVHR and LVHR.

RESULTS

From 2008-2013, 149,622 ventral hernia surgeries were identified; 117,028 open, 32,243 laparoscopic, and 351 robotic. Open repairs were excluded. RVHR rose annually with 2013 containing 47.9% of all RVHRs. RVHR patients were more likely to be older and have more chronic conditions. There was no difference between length of stay. Pneumonia rates were higher with RVHR; however, after controlling for confounding variables, there was no difference in pneumonia rates. Mortality and other major complications were similar. Total charges were increased for RVHR in univariate and multivariate analysis. RVHR was more common in teaching hospitals and wealthier zip codes.

CONCLUSION

RVHR demonstrates comparable safety to the laparoscopic technique, with increased charges and increased volume in urban teaching hospitals and patients from areas of higher median income.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较机器人辅助腹疝修补术(RVHR)与腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR)的疗效。

方法

查询2008年10月至2013年12月全国住院患者样本中的腹疝修补术病例。比较RVHR和LVHR患者的人口统计学特征、发病率、死亡率及费用。

结果

2008 - 2013年,共识别出149,622例腹疝手术;其中117,028例为开放手术,32,243例为腹腔镜手术,351例为机器人辅助手术。排除开放手术病例。RVHR的病例数逐年上升,2013年占所有RVHR病例的47.9%。RVHR患者年龄更大,慢性病更多。住院时间无差异。RVHR患者的肺炎发生率更高;然而,在控制混杂变量后,肺炎发生率无差异。死亡率和其他主要并发症相似。单因素和多因素分析均显示RVHR的总费用增加。RVHR在教学医院和较高收入地区的邮政编码区域更为常见。

结论

RVHR与腹腔镜技术相比安全性相当,但费用增加,在城市教学医院以及来自中等收入较高地区的患者中病例数增加。

相似文献

1
A nationwide evaluation of robotic ventral hernia surgery.一项关于机器人辅助腹疝手术的全国性评估。
Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):1158-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
Robotic ventral hernia repair is not superior to laparoscopic: a national database review.机器人腹疝修补术并不优于腹腔镜:国家数据库回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1834-1839. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5872-7. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
3
Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic hernia repair: real-world evidence from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC).机器人辅助和腹腔镜疝修补术:来自美洲疝学会质量合作组织(AHSQC)的真实世界证据。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1331-1341. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07511-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
Reducing Length of Stay Using a Robotic-assisted Approach for Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: A Comparative Analysis From the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative.使用机器人辅助方法减少Retromuscular 腹疝修补术的住院时间:来自美洲疝学会质量合作组织的比较分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):210-217. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244.
5
Nationwide Readmissions Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.全国范围内微创与开放腹外疝修补术再入院分析:一项回顾性基于人群的研究。
Am Surg. 2022 Mar;88(3):463-470. doi: 10.1177/00031348211050835. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
6
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: One-year Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人与腹腔镜腹外疝修补术的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、盲法随机对照临床试验的一年结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1076-1080. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004795.
7
Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemographic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample.腹腔镜与开放式疝修补术:全国住院患者样本的结果和社会人口统计学利用结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2432-z. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
8
Robotic versus hybrid assisted ventral hernia repair: a prospective one-year comparative study of clinical outcomes.机器人与杂交辅助腹疝修补术:一项前瞻性临床结局的一年比较研究。
Acta Chir Belg. 2023 Aug;123(4):411-417. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2069656. Epub 2022 May 4.
9
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience.使用外科补片的机器人辅助腹疝修补术:我的手术方法及早期经验病例系列
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):248-254. doi: 10.1111/ans.15071. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair.机器人与开放式腹疝修补术的临床结果和成本比较。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jul;226(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.031. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.机器人腹疝修补术的成本核算方法:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03358-z.
2
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With Intraperitoneal Mesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Perioperative Outcomes Randomised Controlled Trials.腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹膜内补片修补腹疝:一项比较围手术期结局的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jan 22;3:13809. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13809. eCollection 2024.
3
Robotic sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: updated series and outcomes.
机器人辅助糖面包式造口旁疝修补术:最新系列病例及结果
Hernia. 2025 Jan 3;29(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03227-1.
4
The Evolving Applications of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty (LIRA) in Ventral Hernia Repair-A Systematic Review.腹腔镜体内腹直肌筋膜成形术(LIRA)在腹疝修补术中的应用进展——一项系统评价
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Oct 23;3:13497. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13497. eCollection 2024.
5
EARLY OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC ENHANCED VIEW TOTALLY EXTRAPERITONEAL VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE.机器人增强视图完全经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术的早期结果:单中心经验。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Sep 13;37:e1825. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400032e1825. eCollection 2024.
6
Robotic repair of moderate-sized midline ventral hernias reduced complications, readmissions, and length of hospitalization compared to open techniques.与开放技术相比,机器人修复中型中线腹疝可减少并发症、再入院和住院时间。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 30;18(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01909-7.
7
Computed tomography measurements to predict need for robotic transversus abdominis release: a single institution analysis.计算断层扫描测量预测机器人腹横肌释放的需求:单机构分析。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1649-1655. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03007-x. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
8
Robotic Platform: What It Does and Does Not Offer in Hernia Surgery.机器人平台:它在疝气手术中的作用与局限
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Feb 14;3:12701. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.12701. eCollection 2024.
9
Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术用于腹股沟疝和腹疝修补术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):24-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10545-5. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
10
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜切口疝修补术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):321-332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02881-1. Epub 2023 Sep 19.