• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与开放式腹疝修补术的临床结果和成本比较。

A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair.

机构信息

Good Samaritan Medical Center, Brockton, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Good Samaritan Medical Center, Brockton, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2023 Jul;226(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.031. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.031
PMID:36740503
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As robotic ventral hernia repair(VHR) adoption increases, real-world evidence is needed to ensure appropriate utilization.

METHODS

Data for open and robotic VHR(OVHR, RVHR) was retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes and costs were compared via inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated for RVHR.

RESULTS

675 open and 609 robotic ventral hernia repairs were included. Demographics and hernia characteristics were comparable. Complications rates were lower in RVHR(p < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade-III complications were lower in RVHR(13.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). RVHR resulted in fewer surgical site events(21.5% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). Recurrence rates were greater in OVHR(8.9% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). The higher RVHR hospital costs (Δ = $2456, p = 0.005) were balanced by the lower post-discharge costs, compared to OVHR(Δ = $799, p = 0.023). Total costs did not differ(Δ = $1656 p = 0.081).

CONCLUSION

Although hospital costs were higher, post-discharge expenses favored RVHR due to the lower postoperative complications, which lead to comparable total costs to OVHR.

摘要

背景

随着机器人腹侧疝修补术(VHR)的应用增加,需要真实世界的证据来确保其合理利用。

方法

回顾性分析了开放和机器人 VHR(OVHR、RVHR)的数据。使用倾向评分进行逆概率治疗加权,通过比较治疗效果来评估 RVHR 的效果。

结果

共纳入 675 例开放 VHR 和 609 例机器人 VHR。患者的人口统计学和疝特征具有可比性。RVHR 的并发症发生率较低(p<0.001)。Clavien-Dindo 分级 III 级并发症的发生率较低(13.2%比 4.9%,p<0.001)。RVHR 导致的手术部位事件较少(21.5%比 12.2%,p<0.001)。OVHR 的复发率较高(8.9%比 2.8%,p<0.001)。虽然 RVHR 的医院费用较高(Δ=2456 美元,p=0.005),但与 OVHR 相比,RVHR 的出院后费用较低(Δ=799 美元,p=0.023)。总费用没有差异(Δ=1656 美元,p=0.081)。

结论

尽管医院费用较高,但由于术后并发症较低,RVHR 的出院后费用较低,导致其总费用与 OVHR 相当。

相似文献

1
A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair.机器人与开放式腹疝修补术的临床结果和成本比较。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jul;226(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.031. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹疝修补术的系统评价与荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Feb;94(1-2):37-46. doi: 10.1111/ans.18822. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Robotic ventral hernia repair is not superior to laparoscopic: a national database review.机器人腹疝修补术并不优于腹腔镜:国家数据库回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1834-1839. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5872-7. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下腹疝修补术的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02997-4.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review.机器人辅助腹疝修补术的系统评价与荟萃分析:ROVER评价
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03274-2.
6
Learning Curves for Robotic-Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair.机器人辅助腹疝修补术的学习曲线
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2448521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48521.
7
Comparing robotic to open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a multi-center propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助与开放后肌下腹直肌旁疝修补术的比较:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11922-y.
8
Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.机器人腹疝修补术的成本核算方法:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03358-z.
9
Transfascial Fixation vs No Fixation for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repairs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经腹筋膜固定与非固定治疗开放型腹横肌后腹疝修补术:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):789-795. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1786.
10
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创与开放造口旁疝修补术:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2025 Sep;49(9):2382-2398. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70013. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.机器人腹疝修补术的成本核算方法:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03358-z.
3
Investigating surgeon performance metrics as key predictors of robotic herniorrhaphy outcomes using iterative machine learning models: retrospective study.
使用迭代机器学习模型研究外科医生表现指标作为机器人疝修补术结果的关键预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae160.
4
Open versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: outcomes of the ORREO prospective randomized controlled trial.开放式与机器人辅助肌后腹疝修补术:ORREO前瞻性随机对照试验的结果
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7466-7474. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11202-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
5
Cost analysis of open versus robot-assisted ventral hernia repair - a retrospective cohort study.开放式与机器人辅助腹疝修补术的成本分析-回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1823-1829. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03089-7. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
Hospital costs of robotic-assisted and open treatment of large ventral hernias.机器人辅助与开放式治疗大型腹侧疝的医院成本。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62550-w.
7
Robotic transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repairs is associated with low surgical site occurrence rates and length of stay despite increasing modifiable comorbidities.机器人腹横肌松解(TAR)用于治疗腹疝修补术,尽管合并症的可改变因素增加,但与较低的手术部位发生率和住院时间相关。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1727-1735. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03044-6. Epub 2024 May 1.
8
Robotic repair of moderate-sized midline ventral hernias reduced complications, readmissions, and length of hospitalization compared to open techniques.与开放技术相比,机器人修复中型中线腹疝可减少并发症、再入院和住院时间。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 30;18(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01909-7.
9
Strength of small-bites abdominal wall closure using different suturing methods and materials in an experimental animal model.不同缝合方法和材料在实验动物模型中小切口腹壁关闭的强度。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02945-2. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
Short-term outcomes after open versus robot-assisted repair of ventral hernias: a nationwide database study.开放手术与机器人辅助修复腹疝的短期结果:全国数据库研究。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02923-8. Epub 2023 Nov 30.