• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国的精神能力立法:对缺乏能力的成年人及其照顾者经历的系统评价。

Mental capacity legislation in the UK: systematic review of the experiences of adults lacking capacity and their carers.

作者信息

Wilson Sam

机构信息

Royal Cornhill Hospital, Aberdeen.

出版信息

BJPsych Bull. 2017 Oct;41(5):260-266. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055160.

DOI:10.1192/pb.bp.116.055160
PMID:29018550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5623884/
Abstract

Capacity legislation in the UK allows substitute decision-making for adults lacking capacity. Research has explored the experiences of such adults and their carers in relation to the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England and Wales. A systematic review of the relevant research was performed using a framework method. The legislation provided mechanisms for substitute decision-making which were seen as useful, but there were negative experiences. Decision-making did not always seem to follow the legislative principles. Awareness of the legislation was limited. Most research was qualitative and some was of low methodological quality. Data were too heterogeneous to allow comparisons between English and Scottish law. Capacity legislation was generally viewed positively. However, some experiences were perceived negatively, and the potential benefits of the legislation were not always utilised.

摘要

英国的能力立法允许为缺乏能力的成年人进行替代决策。已有研究探讨了这类成年人及其照料者在涉及2000年《苏格兰无行为能力成年人法案》以及英格兰和威尔士2005年《精神能力法案》方面的经历。使用框架法对相关研究进行了系统综述。该立法提供了替代决策机制,这些机制被认为是有用的,但也存在负面经历。决策似乎并不总是遵循立法原则。对该立法的认知有限。大多数研究是定性研究,有些研究的方法质量较低。数据过于多样化,无法对英格兰和苏格兰法律进行比较。能力立法总体上受到积极看待。然而,一些经历被认为是负面的,该立法的潜在益处并未总是得到利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbe0/5623884/6e1a8caf08be/261f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbe0/5623884/6e1a8caf08be/261f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbe0/5623884/6e1a8caf08be/261f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Mental capacity legislation in the UK: systematic review of the experiences of adults lacking capacity and their carers.英国的精神能力立法:对缺乏能力的成年人及其照顾者经历的系统评价。
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Oct;41(5):260-266. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055160.
2
Principles, patient welfare and the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(2):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
3
Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation.心理健康与无行为能力立法的融合。
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;188:504-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.6.504.
4
Living 'a life like ours': support workers' accounts of substitute decision-making in residential care homes for adults with intellectual disabilities.过“我们这样的生活”:支持工作人员在成人智障人士居住护理院中的替代决策的叙述。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):144-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01228.x. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
5
An international comparison of legal frameworks for supported and substitute decision-making in mental health services.精神卫生服务中支持性和替代性决策法律框架的国际比较。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;44:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
6
Carers' experiences of involuntary admission under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.照护者在心理健康立法下非自愿住院的经历:系统评价与质性元整合
BJPsych Open. 2020 Feb 11;6(2):e19. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.101.
7
Constructing and reconstructing 'best interests': An interpretative examination of substitute decision-making under the .构建与重构“最佳利益”:对[具体法案名称缺失]下替代决策的解释性审视
J Soc Welf Fam Law. 2007 Jun 1;29(2). doi: 10.1080/09649060701666598.
8
Making decisions for incapable adults: the Scottish law.为无行为能力成年人做决策:苏格兰法律
Br J Community Nurs. 2006 Jul;11(7):308-13. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.7.21447.
9
The Mental Capacity Act 2005: implications for dietetic practice.《2005年精神能力法案》:对饮食实践的影响。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007 Aug;20(4):302-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00795.x.
10
What do we know about the application of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) in healthcare practice regarding decision-making for frail and older people? A systematic literature review.关于《精神能力法案》(2005年)在医疗保健实践中针对体弱老年人决策制定方面的应用,我们了解多少?一项系统的文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):295-308. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12310. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
"Get Well Enough to Make the Right Decision for Themselves"-Experiences and Perspectives of Clinicians Working with People with Serious Mental Illness and Their Substitute Decision Makers.“康复到足以自行做出正确决定”——与严重精神疾病患者及其替代决策者共事的临床医生的经验与观点
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 20;15(5):704. doi: 10.3390/bs15050704.
2
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research provisions under the Mental Capacity Act (2005) in England and Wales: Recruitment of adults with capacity and communication difficulties.一项对英格兰和威尔士《精神能力法案》(2005 年)下研究条款的系统回顾和叙述性综合:有能力和沟通困难的成年人的招募。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0256697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256697. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.以人权之名逆转来之不易的胜利:对《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条一般性意见的批判
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;2(9):844-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00218-7. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
2
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
3
Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers.
痴呆症患者的日常决策:一项对痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者进行的纵向访谈研究的结果。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jun;25(6):949-61. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000306. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
4
When the profession becomes personal: dementia care practitioners as family caregivers.当职业变得个人化:痴呆症护理从业者作为家庭护理者。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Jun;24(6):902-10. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211002882. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
5
'I live for today': a qualitative study investigating older people's attitudes to advance planning.“活在当下”:一项定性研究调查老年人对预先规划的态度。
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 Jan;19(1):52-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00948.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
6
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.一种用于评估混合方法研究的评分系统,同时也用于在混合研究综述中评估定性、定量和混合方法的原始研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Apr;46(4):529-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
7
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.系统评价中定性研究的主题综合方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
8
Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment.精神能力、法律行为能力与治疗同意
J R Soc Med. 2004 Sep;97(9):415-20. doi: 10.1177/014107680409700902.