• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用对照人群信息调整预期死亡率:一个使用社会经济地位的示例。

Adjusting Expected Mortality Rates Using Information From a Control Population: An Example Using Socioeconomic Status.

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;187(4):828-836. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx303.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwx303
PMID:29020167
Abstract

Expected or reference mortality rates are commonly used in the calculation of measures such as relative survival in population-based cancer survival studies and standardized mortality ratios. These expected rates are usually presented according to age, sex, and calendar year. In certain situations, stratification of expected rates by other factors is required to avoid potential bias if interest lies in quantifying measures according to such factors as, for example, socioeconomic status. If data are not available on a population level, information from a control population could be used to adjust expected rates. We have presented two approaches for adjusting expected mortality rates using information from a control population: a Poisson generalized linear model and a flexible parametric survival model. We used a control group from BCBaSe-a register-based, matched breast cancer cohort in Sweden with diagnoses between 1992 and 2012-to illustrate the two methods using socioeconomic status as a risk factor of interest. Results showed that Poisson and flexible parametric survival approaches estimate similar adjusted mortality rates according to socioeconomic status. Additional uncertainty involved in the methods to estimate stratified, expected mortality rates described in this study can be accounted for using a parametric bootstrap, but this might make little difference if using a large control population.

摘要

预期或参考死亡率通常用于计算基于人群的癌症生存研究和标准化死亡率比等指标。这些预期比率通常根据年龄、性别和日历年份呈现。在某些情况下,如果研究兴趣是根据社会经济地位等因素来量化指标,则需要按其他因素对预期比率进行分层,以避免潜在的偏差。如果没有关于人群的数据,则可以使用对照人群的信息来调整预期比率。我们提出了两种使用对照人群信息调整预期死亡率的方法:泊松广义线性模型和灵活参数生存模型。我们使用了来自瑞典 BCBaSe 的一个基于登记的、匹配的乳腺癌队列的对照组,该队列的诊断时间在 1992 年至 2012 年之间,以社会经济地位作为感兴趣的风险因素来说明这两种方法。结果表明,泊松和灵活参数生存方法根据社会经济地位估计相似的调整死亡率。本研究中描述的分层预期死亡率估计方法所涉及的额外不确定性可以使用参数自举来解释,但如果使用大型对照组,这可能影响不大。

相似文献

1
Adjusting Expected Mortality Rates Using Information From a Control Population: An Example Using Socioeconomic Status.利用对照人群信息调整预期死亡率:一个使用社会经济地位的示例。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;187(4):828-836. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx303.
2
Assessing the impact of including variation in general population mortality on standard errors of relative survival and loss in life expectancy.评估在相对生存率和预期寿命损失的标准误差中纳入一般人群死亡率变化的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 2;22(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01597-7.
3
Including uncertainty of the expected mortality rates in the prediction of loss in life expectancy.在预期死亡率的不确定性纳入到预期寿命损失的预测中。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02118-w.
4
Adult children's socioeconomic resources and mothers' survival after a breast cancer diagnosis: a Swedish population-based cohort study.成年子女的社会经济资源与母亲乳腺癌诊断后的生存情况:一项基于瑞典人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 30;7(3):e014968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014968.
5
[State of health of populations residing in geothermal areas of Tuscany].[托斯卡纳地热区居民的健康状况]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 1):1-104.
6
Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.1990年香港燃料含硫量限制立法的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Aug(170):5-91.
7
Social differences in breast cancer survival in relation to patient management within a National Health Care System (Sweden).在国家医疗保健系统(瑞典)内,乳腺癌生存率的社会差异与患者管理的关系。
Int J Cancer. 2009 Jan 1;124(1):180-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23875.
8
Mortality rates among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a population-based cohort study in Denmark.早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的死亡率:丹麦基于人群的队列研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Sep 21;103(18):1363-72. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr299. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
9
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
10
Socioeconomic status and breast carcinoma survival in four racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study.四个种族/族裔群体的社会经济地位与乳腺癌生存率:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer. 2003 Mar 1;97(5):1303-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11160.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy over Time: A Cohort and Cost-Effectiveness Study.评估抗逆转录病毒疗法随时间推移的成本效益:一项队列研究和成本效益研究
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Nov;8(6):847-856. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00513-7. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Income disparities in loss in life expectancy after colon and rectal cancers: a Swedish register-based study.结直肠癌患者预期寿命损失的收入差距:一项瑞典基于登记的研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 May 9;78(6):402-408. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-221916.
3
Using Relative Survival to Estimate the Burden of Kidney Failure.
利用相对生存率估计肾衰竭负担。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Jan;83(1):28-36.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
4
Assessing the impact of including variation in general population mortality on standard errors of relative survival and loss in life expectancy.评估在相对生存率和预期寿命损失的标准误差中纳入一般人群死亡率变化的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 2;22(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01597-7.
5
Socioeconomic status and its relation with breast cancer recurrence and survival in young women in the Netherlands.荷兰年轻女性的社会经济地位及其与乳腺癌复发和生存的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;77:102118. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102118. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Understanding disparities in cancer prognosis: An extension of mediation analysis to the relative survival framework.理解癌症预后差异:中介分析在相对生存框架中的扩展。
Biom J. 2021 Feb;63(2):341-353. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900355. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
Correcting inaccurate background mortality in excess hazard models through breakpoints.通过断点校正超额风险模型中的不准确背景死亡率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01139-z.
8
Marginal measures and causal effects using the relative survival framework.使用相对生存框架的边缘测量和因果效应。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 1;49(2):619-628. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz268.