Suppr超能文献

经胰预切开乳头与双导丝技术在困难胆道插管中的前瞻性随机研究。

Transpancreatic precut papillotomy versus double-guidewire technique in difficult biliary cannulation: prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2018 Jan;50(1):33-39. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118000. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Difficult biliary cannulation and unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation are thought to be important contributors to pancreatitis occurring after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Our aim was to compare and evaluate the rates of success and complications of transpancreatic precut papillotomy (TPPP) and the double-guidewire technique (DGT), both with prophylactic pancreatic stenting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April 2011 to March 2014, patients with difficult biliary cannulation, in whom we planned to first position a guidewire in the pancreatic duct, were enrolled, and 68 patients were prospectively randomly allocated to two groups (TPPP 34, DGT 34). We evaluated the rates of success and complications for each group.

RESULTS

TPPP had a significantly higher success rate (94.1 %) than DGT (58.8 %). The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 2.9 % in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the overall rate of complications related to cannulation. CONCLUSION : If biliary cannulation cannot be achieved, TPPP should be selected first after unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation.

摘要

背景和研究目的

内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)术后胰腺炎的发生被认为与困难的胆管插管和意外的胰管插管有关。我们的目的是比较和评估经胰管预切开乳头切开术(TPPP)和双导丝技术(DGT)的成功率和并发症,两者均行预防性胰管支架置入。

患者和方法

从 2011 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月,我们前瞻性纳入了胆管插管困难的患者,计划先将导丝置于胰管内,68 例患者被随机分为两组(TPPP34 例,DGT34 例)。我们评估了每组的成功率和并发症。

结果

TPPP 的成功率(94.1%)显著高于 DGT(58.8%)。两组术后胰腺炎的发生率均为 2.9%。两组在与插管相关的总并发症发生率方面无显著差异。

结论

如果无法进行胆管插管,在意外胰管插管后应首先选择 TPPP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验