Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan.
Translational Research and Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 10;12(1):13627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17809-5.
Although the efficacy and safety of salvage techniques for biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have been reported, few reports analyzed the choice of techniques and their clinical outcomes in large cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of biliary cannulation in patients with native papillae. We retrospectively identified 1021 patients who underwent initial ERCP from January 2013 to March 2020. We investigated background factors, treatment details, cannulation success rates, and adverse event rates. Then we analyzed a series of treatment processes, including salvage techniques such as double guidewire technique (DGT), needle knife pre-cutting (NKP), and transpancreatic pre-cut papillotomy (TPPP). The initial ERCP success rate using standard technique alone was 62.8%, which increased to 94.3% including salvage techniques. Salvage techniques were frequently required in patients with long oral protrusions (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.80-3.15; p < 0.001). A total of 503 cases (49.3%) had long oral protrusions, 47.5% of which required the salvage techniques, much higher than 27.5% of not-long cases. Patients with long oral protrusions had a higher frequency of NKP. In conclusion, patients with long oral protrusions frequently required salvage techniques. Salvage techniques may help to overcome many difficult biliary cannulation cases.
虽然已经有报道称挽救性内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)胆管插管技术的疗效和安全性,但很少有研究分析过这些技术在大样本量患者中的选择及其临床结果。本研究旨在评估在原发性乳头患者中进行胆管插管的结果。我们回顾性地确定了 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受初次 ERCP 的 1021 例患者。我们调查了背景因素、治疗细节、插管成功率和不良事件发生率。然后,我们分析了一系列治疗过程,包括挽救性技术,如双导丝技术(DGT)、针形刀预切开(NKP)和经胰管预切开乳头切开术(TPPP)。单独使用标准技术的初次 ERCP 成功率为 62.8%,包括挽救性技术在内,成功率增加到 94.3%。在口腔突出较长的患者中,经常需要挽救性技术(OR 2.38;95%CI 1.80-3.15;p<0.001)。共有 503 例(49.3%)口腔突出较长,其中 47.5%需要挽救性技术,明显高于口腔突出不明显的 27.5%。口腔突出较长的患者中 NKP 的使用频率更高。总之,口腔突出较长的患者经常需要挽救性技术。挽救性技术可能有助于克服许多困难的胆管插管病例。