Kraal Tim, The Bertram, Boer Ronald, van den Borne M P, Koenraadt Koen, Goossens Pjotr, Eygendaal Denise
Department of orthopaedic surgery, Amphia ziekenhuis Breda, Molengracht 21, 4818, CK, Breda, The Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Oct 11;18(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1763-2.
There is no consensus about the optimal treatment strategy for frozen shoulders (FS). Conservative treatment consisting of intra-articular corticosteroid infiltrations and physiotherapy are considered appropriate for most patients. However, with a conservative strategy, patients experience a prolonged rehabilitation period with a considerable amount of pain and disabilities in daily life. Also, at long term, a residual amount of pain and restriction of range of motion is frequently reported. Manipulation under anesthesia is a short and relative simple procedure with the potential to rapidly reduce symptoms and restore the range of motion. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of MUA followed by a PT program compared to a PT program alone, in the treatment of patients with a stage two FS. We hypothesize that the course of the disease can be shortened with MUA with a quicker functional recovery.
This is a prospective, single center, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients will be allocated to either the manipulation (MUA) group or the physiotherapy alone (PT) group. In the MUA group manipulation will be performed under interscalene block, directly followed by an intensive physiotherapy treatment protocol, with the goal to maintain the obtained range of motion. Patients allocated to the PT group are given advice and education and receive a written protocol to hand out to their physical therapist based on the recent guideline of the Dutch Shoulder Network for the treatment of frozen shoulders. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample size, patients demographics, presence of diabetes mellitus, range of motion, duration of symptoms till randomization and will be presented for each treatment group. The SPADI is used as primary functional outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters are; OSS, NPRS, EQ-5D 3-L, passive range of motion, WORQ-UP, duration of symptoms, usage of analgesics and adverse events. A sample size of 41 subjects in each group was calculated. Follow up is planned after 1,3 and 12 months. The length of physiotherapy treatment in both groups is variable, depending on individual progression. Differences between groups in outcome parameters will be analysed using the linear mixed modelling and the restricted maximum likelihood ratio technique for estimating the model parameters.
Successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment strategy for patients with a stage two frozen shoulder. The results of this study can lead to a better understanding for the role of manipulation in the treatment of frozen shoulders.
This trial is registered in the Dutch Trial Register under the number NTR6182 on the 20th of February 2017.
对于冻结肩(FS)的最佳治疗策略尚无共识。关节内注射皮质类固醇并结合物理治疗的保守治疗被认为适用于大多数患者。然而,采用保守治疗策略时,患者的康复期会延长,日常生活中会有相当程度的疼痛和功能障碍。此外,长期来看,经常会有残留疼痛和活动范围受限的情况。麻醉下手法松解是一种简短且相对简单的操作,有可能迅速减轻症状并恢复活动范围。本试验的目的是评估与单纯物理治疗方案相比,麻醉下手法松解(MUA)联合物理治疗方案在治疗二期FS患者中的有效性。我们假设MUA可缩短病程并实现更快的功能恢复。
这是一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。符合条件的患者将被分配至手法松解(MUA)组或单纯物理治疗(PT)组。在MUA组,手法松解将在肌间沟阻滞下进行,随后直接进行强化物理治疗方案,目标是维持所获得的活动范围。分配至PT组的患者将接受建议和教育,并根据荷兰肩部网络治疗冻结肩的最新指南获得一份书面方案,以便交给其物理治疗师。描述性统计将用于描述样本量、患者人口统计学特征、糖尿病的存在情况、活动范围、随机分组前的症状持续时间,并将针对每个治疗组进行呈现。SPADI用作主要功能结局参数。次要结局参数包括:OSS、NPRS、EQ-5D 3-L、被动活动范围、WORQ-UP、症状持续时间、镇痛药使用情况和不良事件。计算得出每组样本量为41名受试者。计划在1个月、3个月和12个月后进行随访。两组物理治疗的时长因个体进展情况而异。将使用线性混合模型和受限最大似然比技术分析结局参数在组间的差异,以估计模型参数。
本试验的成功完成将为二期冻结肩患者的最佳治疗策略提供证据。本研究结果有助于更好地理解手法松解在冻结肩治疗中的作用。
本试验于2017年2月20日在荷兰试验注册中心注册,注册号为NTR6182。