Suppr超能文献

与物理治疗相比,麻醉下手法治疗对二期冻结肩活动范围的改善:一项随机对照试验。

Improved range of motion after manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy for stage two frozen shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Kraal Tim, de Wit Yordi, The Bertram, van Boekel Leonieke, Oost Iris Koenraadt-van, Boer Ronald, Borne Maaike Vd, Goossens Pjotr, Koenraadt Koen, Eygendaal Denise

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2023 Dec 6;8(2):293-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.004. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common cause of shoulder pain and stiffness. Conservative treatment is sufficient for the majority of patients with long-term recovery of shoulder function. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is known as a well-established treatment option if conservative treatment fails. It is unknown whether MUA does indeed shorten the duration of symptoms or leads to a superior outcome compared to conservative treatment. The objective of the current trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of MUA followed by a physiotherapy (PT) program compared to a PT program alone in patients with stage 2 FS.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients between 18 and 70 years old with stage 2 FS were deemed eligible if an initial course of conservative treatment consisting of PT and intra-articular corticosteroid infiltration was considered unsatisfactory. Patients were randomized, and data was collected with an online data management platform (CASTOR). MUA was performed by a single surgeon under interscalene block, and intensive PT treatment protocol was started within 4 hours after MUA. In the PT group, patients were referred to instructed physiotherapist, and treatment was guided by tissue irritability. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score. Secondary outcomes were pain, range of motion (ROM), Oxford Shoulder Score, quality of life, and ability to work.

RESULTS

In total, 82 patients were included, 42 in the PT group and 40 in the MUA group. There was a significant improvement in SPADI, Oxford Shoulder Score, pain, ROM, and quality of life in both groups at 1-year follow-up. SPADI scores at three months were significantly improved in favor of MUA. MUA showed a significantly bigger increase in anteflexion and abduction compared to PT at all points of follow-up. No significant differences between both groups were found for all other parameters. No fractures, dislocations, or brachial plexus injuries occurred in this trial.

CONCLUSION

MUA in stage 2 FS can be considered safe and results in a faster recovery of ROM and improved functional outcome, measured with SPADI scores, compared to PT alone in the short term. After 1 year, except for slightly better ROM scores for MUA, the result of MUA is equal to PT.

摘要

背景

肩周炎(FS)是肩部疼痛和僵硬的常见原因。对于大多数患者而言,保守治疗足以实现肩部功能的长期恢复。若保守治疗失败,麻醉下手法松解(MUA)是一种公认的治疗选择。与保守治疗相比,MUA是否真的能缩短症状持续时间或带来更好的治疗效果尚不清楚。本试验的目的是评估在2期FS患者中,与单纯物理治疗(PT)方案相比,MUA联合PT方案的有效性。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性、单中心随机对照试验。年龄在18至70岁之间的2期FS患者,若由PT和关节内皮质类固醇注射组成的初始保守治疗疗程被认为不满意,则被视为符合条件。患者被随机分组,并通过在线数据管理平台(CASTOR)收集数据。MUA由一名外科医生在肌间沟阻滞下进行,强化PT治疗方案在MUA后4小时内开始。在PT组中,患者被转介给有指导经验的物理治疗师,治疗以组织激惹性为指导。主要结局是肩痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)评分。次要结局包括疼痛、活动范围(ROM)、牛津肩部评分、生活质量和工作能力。

结果

总共纳入了82例患者,PT组42例,MUA组40例。在1年随访时,两组的SPADI、牛津肩部评分、疼痛、ROM和生活质量均有显著改善。3个月时,MUA组的SPADI评分显著改善。在所有随访时间点,MUA组的前屈和外展增加幅度均显著大于PT组。两组在所有其他参数上均未发现显著差异。本试验中未发生骨折、脱位或臂丛神经损伤。

结论

在2期FS中,MUA可被认为是安全的,与单纯PT相比,短期内ROM恢复更快,以SPADI评分衡量的功能结局得到改善。1年后,除了MUA组的ROM评分略好外,MUA的结果与PT相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efe5/10920131/13e3ecb8ad69/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验