Alfano Dennis P, Finlayson M Alan J, Stearns Gerry M, Neilson Patricia M
a Department of Psychology , University of Regina.
b Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals & McMaster University.
Clin Neuropsychol. 1990 Mar;4(1):69-79. doi: 10.1080/13854049008401498.
This study examined the application of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) to the assessment of personality and emotional status in neurologic patients. Eighteen specialists in the clinical neurosciences examined the standard MMPI and indicated those items they felt were potentially tapping valid manifestations of neurologic damage or dysfunction. Forty-four items, loading primarily on the Hs, Hy, and Sc scales, were identified. These items were then deleted from the standard MMPI protocols of a heterogeneous group of 115 verified neurologic patients and the protocols rescored in the usual fashion. Corresponding high-points between the original MMPI and the modified version occurred in 46% of the cases. Comparable two-point code types occurred in only 29% of the cases. Taking into account the neurologic content of the MMPI can thus considerably alter the MMPI profile of a neurologic patient. Caution should thus be exercised with regard to the application and literal interpretation of the MMPI in neurologic cases.
本研究考察了明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI)在评估神经科患者人格和情绪状态方面的应用。18位临床神经科学专家检查了标准MMPI,并指出他们认为可能反映神经损伤或功能障碍有效表现的项目。确定了44个主要载荷于Hs、Hy和Sc量表的项目。然后从115名经证实的神经科患者的异质组的标准MMPI协议中删除这些项目,并以常规方式对协议重新计分。在46%的病例中,原始MMPI与修改版之间出现了相应的高分点。仅29%的病例中出现了可比的两点编码类型。因此,考虑到MMPI的神经学内容会显著改变神经科患者的MMPI剖面图。因此,在神经科病例中应用MMPI及其字面解释时应谨慎。