Bondi Mark W, Monsch Andreas U, Butters Nelson, Salmon David P, Paulsen Jane S
a San Diego Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center , University of California at San Diego, School of Medicine.
Clin Neuropsychol. 1993 Apr;7(2):161-170. doi: 10.1080/13854049308401518.
Nelson's (1976) modified version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (mWCST) was administered to 23 patients with mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), 33 moderate DAT patients, 31 severe DAT patients, and 75 demographically matched normal control (NC) subjects. DAT patients attained fewer categories and committed significantly more perseverative errors than NC subjects. None of the DAT patient subgroups differed in the number of perseverative errors committed, but the severe DAT patients attained significantly fewer categories than either the mild or moderate DAT patients. Receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves were plotted to determine which among several of the measures provided the best sensitivity (i.e., correctly identified patients) and specificity (i.e., correctly identified normal controls). The number of categories attained was found to be the best discriminative measure for the entire sample of DAT patients, whereas the number of perseverative errors provided the best discriminability in mild DAT patients. Findings suggest that Nelson's original modification of the WCST is sensitive in the early detection of DAT.
对23例轻度阿尔茨海默型痴呆(DAT)患者、33例中度DAT患者、31例重度DAT患者以及75名人口统计学特征匹配的正常对照(NC)受试者进行了纳尔逊(1976年)改良版威斯康星卡片分类测验(mWCST)。与NC受试者相比,DAT患者达到的类别更少,且持续性错误显著更多。DAT患者亚组在犯持续性错误的数量上没有差异,但重度DAT患者达到的类别明显少于轻度或中度DAT患者。绘制了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以确定几种测量方法中哪一种具有最佳的敏感性(即正确识别患者)和特异性(即正确识别正常对照)。发现达到的类别数量是整个DAT患者样本的最佳判别指标,而持续性错误的数量在轻度DAT患者中具有最佳的判别能力。研究结果表明,纳尔逊对WCST的原始改良在DAT的早期检测中具有敏感性。