Suppr超能文献

两种不同训练周期化模型对优秀女子手球队运动员身体和生理方面的影响。

Effects of Two Different Training Periodization Models on Physical and Physiological Aspects of Elite Female Team Handball Players.

机构信息

Department of General and Specific Didactics, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):280-287. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259.

Abstract

Manchado, C, Cortell-Tormo, JM, and Tortosa-Martínez, J. Effects of two different training periodization models on physical and physiological aspects of elite female team handball players. J Strength Cond Res 32(1): 280-287, 2018-The aim of this study was to compare training-induced changes in selected physiological and physical team handball performance factors after 2 training periodization models: traditional periodization (TP) vs. block periodization (BP). Eleven female team handball players who played over 2 consecutive seasons for a Spanish first league team were assessed twice per season during a training cycle. On each occasion, participants completed anthropometric, maximal strength, and lower-body power assessments. In addition, incremental tests to determine maximum oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), sprint- and sport-specific throwing velocity tests were performed. Block periodization group experienced significantly greater improvements than TP on squat jump (5.97%; p < 0.001), countermovement jump (8.76%; p = 0.011), hand-grip strength (8.22%; p = 0.029), bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) (5.14%; p = 0.049), 10-m sprint (-6.19%; p < 0.001), and 20-m sprint (2.95%; p = 0.008). Greater changes in BP group (p ≤ 0.05) were also found for the throwing velocities in sport-specific tests compared with the TP group. No significant difference between the groups were detected for the half-squat 1RM (p = 0.15) and the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (p = 0.44). These findings suggest that BP may be more effective than TP for improving important physiological and physical team handball performance factors in high level female handball players.

摘要

曼查多、C、科泰尔-托莫和托罗萨-马丁内斯,JM。两种不同训练周期模型对精英女子手球队员身体和生理方面的影响。《力量与条件研究杂志》32(1):280-287,2018 年。本研究的目的是比较传统周期化(TP)和块状周期化(BP)两种训练周期模型后,选定的生理和手球物理表现因素的训练诱导变化。11 名参加西班牙首联赛的女子手球队员,在一个训练周期内,每赛季进行两次评估。在每次评估中,参与者完成了人体测量、最大力量和下肢力量评估。此外,还进行了递增测试,以确定最大摄氧量(V[Combining Dot Above]O2max)、冲刺和专项投掷速度测试。与 TP 相比,BP 组在深蹲跳(5.97%;p < 0.001)、反向跳(8.76%;p = 0.011)、握力(8.22%;p = 0.029)、卧推 1 次最大重复次数(1RM)(5.14%;p = 0.049)、10 米冲刺(-6.19%;p < 0.001)和 20 米冲刺(2.95%;p = 0.008)方面有显著更大的提高。BP 组在专项测试中的投掷速度方面也发现了更大的变化(p ≤ 0.05),与 TP 组相比。两组在半蹲 1RM(p = 0.15)和 V[Combining Dot Above]O2max(p = 0.44)方面均无显著差异。这些发现表明,BP 可能比 TP 更有效地提高高水平女手球运动员的重要生理和物理手球表现因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验