Department of General and Specific Didactics, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):280-287. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259.
Manchado, C, Cortell-Tormo, JM, and Tortosa-Martínez, J. Effects of two different training periodization models on physical and physiological aspects of elite female team handball players. J Strength Cond Res 32(1): 280-287, 2018-The aim of this study was to compare training-induced changes in selected physiological and physical team handball performance factors after 2 training periodization models: traditional periodization (TP) vs. block periodization (BP). Eleven female team handball players who played over 2 consecutive seasons for a Spanish first league team were assessed twice per season during a training cycle. On each occasion, participants completed anthropometric, maximal strength, and lower-body power assessments. In addition, incremental tests to determine maximum oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), sprint- and sport-specific throwing velocity tests were performed. Block periodization group experienced significantly greater improvements than TP on squat jump (5.97%; p < 0.001), countermovement jump (8.76%; p = 0.011), hand-grip strength (8.22%; p = 0.029), bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) (5.14%; p = 0.049), 10-m sprint (-6.19%; p < 0.001), and 20-m sprint (2.95%; p = 0.008). Greater changes in BP group (p ≤ 0.05) were also found for the throwing velocities in sport-specific tests compared with the TP group. No significant difference between the groups were detected for the half-squat 1RM (p = 0.15) and the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (p = 0.44). These findings suggest that BP may be more effective than TP for improving important physiological and physical team handball performance factors in high level female handball players.
曼查多、C、科泰尔-托莫和托罗萨-马丁内斯,JM。两种不同训练周期模型对精英女子手球队员身体和生理方面的影响。《力量与条件研究杂志》32(1):280-287,2018 年。本研究的目的是比较传统周期化(TP)和块状周期化(BP)两种训练周期模型后,选定的生理和手球物理表现因素的训练诱导变化。11 名参加西班牙首联赛的女子手球队员,在一个训练周期内,每赛季进行两次评估。在每次评估中,参与者完成了人体测量、最大力量和下肢力量评估。此外,还进行了递增测试,以确定最大摄氧量(V[Combining Dot Above]O2max)、冲刺和专项投掷速度测试。与 TP 相比,BP 组在深蹲跳(5.97%;p < 0.001)、反向跳(8.76%;p = 0.011)、握力(8.22%;p = 0.029)、卧推 1 次最大重复次数(1RM)(5.14%;p = 0.049)、10 米冲刺(-6.19%;p < 0.001)和 20 米冲刺(2.95%;p = 0.008)方面有显著更大的提高。BP 组在专项测试中的投掷速度方面也发现了更大的变化(p ≤ 0.05),与 TP 组相比。两组在半蹲 1RM(p = 0.15)和 V[Combining Dot Above]O2max(p = 0.44)方面均无显著差异。这些发现表明,BP 可能比 TP 更有效地提高高水平女手球运动员的重要生理和物理手球表现因素。