Department of Sociology and Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Nov 1;21(11):81-86. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0788.
While substantial progress is being made in tuberculosis (TB) control, the success of public health efforts is hampered by pervasive stigma.
To perform a systematic literature review to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing TB stigma in patients, health care workers, care givers and the general community.
Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated interventions aimed at reducing TB stigma and were published between 1950 and 2015. We searched eight databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, World Health Organization Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), and complemented the searches by using the snowball strategy and by reviewing relevant grey literature.
Only seven studies were identified as providing quantitative (n = 4) or qualitative (n = 3) evidence of effectiveness in reducing TB stigma. Quality assessment of the studies was poor. Knowledge-shaping and attitude-changing interventions aimed at the public, patients and their families were effective in reducing anticipated stigma. Home visits and support groups were effective in reducing both anticipated and internalised stigma.
There is a dearth of reliable information on the effectiveness of TB stigma-reduction interventions. Knowledge-shaping, attitude-changing and patient-support interventions can be effective in reducing TB stigma, but more rigorous evaluations are needed.
虽然在结核病(TB)控制方面取得了实质性进展,但普遍存在的污名化问题阻碍了公共卫生工作的成功。
进行系统文献综述,评估旨在减少患者、卫生保健工作者、护理人员和一般社区中结核病污名的干预措施的效果。
如果研究评估了旨在减少结核病污名的干预措施,并在 1950 年至 2015 年期间发表,那么这些研究就有资格被纳入。我们搜索了八个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library、Ovid、Embase、PsycInfo、Sociological Abstracts、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、世界卫生组织拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学文献),并通过使用滚雪球策略和审查相关灰色文献来补充搜索。
只有七项研究被确定为提供了定量(n = 4)或定性(n = 3)证据,证明减少结核病污名的有效性。对这些研究的质量评估很差。针对公众、患者及其家属的知识塑造和态度改变干预措施在减少预期污名方面是有效的。家访和支持小组在减少预期和内化污名方面都很有效。
关于减少结核病污名干预措施的有效性的可靠信息很少。知识塑造、态度改变和患者支持干预措施可以有效减少结核病污名,但需要进行更严格的评估。