• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MASTERMIND研究的队列概况:利用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)调查2型糖尿病患者治疗反应的分层情况

Cohort profile for the MASTERMIND study: using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to investigate stratification of response to treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Rodgers Lauren R, Weedon Michael N, Henley William E, Hattersley Andrew T, Shields Beverley M

机构信息

Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 12;7(10):e017989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017989.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017989
PMID:29025846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5652624/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective cohort study using observational data from anonymised primary care records. We identify and extract all patients with type 2 diabetes and associated clinical data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to inform models of disease progression and stratification of treatment.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were extracted from CPRD on 8 August 2016. The initial data set contained all patients (n=313 485) in the database who had received a type 2 diabetes medication. Criteria were applied to identify and exclude those with type 1 diabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome or other forms of diabetes (n=40 204), and for data quality control (n=12). We identified 251 338 patients for inclusion in future analyses of diabetes progression and treatment response.

FINDINGS TO DATE

For 6-month response to treatment, measured by change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), we have 91 765 patients with 119 785 treatment response episodes. The greatest impact on reduction of HbA1c occurs with first-line and second-line treatments, metformin and sulfonylurea. Patients moving to third-line treatments tend to have greater weights and higher body mass index. We have investigated the impact of non-adherence to commonly used glucose-lowering medications on HbA1c. For baseline-adjusted HbA1c change over 1 year, non-adherent patients had lower HbA1c reductions than adherent patients, with mean and 95% CI of -4.4 (-4.7 to -4.0) mmol/mol (-0.40 (-0.43 to -0.37) %).

FUTURE PLANS

Findings from studies using these data will help inform future treatment plans and guidelines. Additional data are added with updates from CPRD. This will increase the numbers of patients on newer medications and add more data on those already receiving treatment. There are several ongoing studies investigating different hypotheses regarding differential response to treatment and progression of diabetes. For side effects, links to Hospital Episode Statistics data, where severe events such as hypoglycaemia will be recorded, will also be explored.

摘要

目的

这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用来自匿名初级医疗记录的观察数据。我们从临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中识别并提取所有2型糖尿病患者及相关临床数据,以建立疾病进展模型和治疗分层模型。

参与者

数据于2016年8月8日从CPRD中提取。初始数据集包含数据库中所有接受过2型糖尿病药物治疗的患者(n = 313485)。应用标准来识别并排除1型糖尿病、多囊卵巢综合征或其他形式糖尿病患者(n = 40204),以及进行数据质量控制(n = 12)。我们确定了251338名患者纳入未来糖尿病进展和治疗反应分析。

迄今发现

对于通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化衡量的6个月治疗反应,我们有91765名患者,共119785次治疗反应事件。对降低HbA1c影响最大的是一线和二线治疗药物二甲双胍和磺脲类药物。转向三线治疗的患者往往体重更大、体重指数更高。我们研究了不依从常用降糖药物对HbA1c的影响。对于1年期间经基线调整的HbA1c变化,不依从患者的HbA1c降低幅度低于依从患者,平均值及95%置信区间为-4.4(-4.7至-4.0)mmol/mol(-0.40(-0.43至-0.37)%)。

未来计划

使用这些数据的研究结果将有助于为未来治疗计划和指南提供信息。随着CPRD的更新会添加更多数据。这将增加使用新药的患者数量,并增加已接受治疗患者的更多数据。有几项正在进行的研究正在调查关于糖尿病治疗反应差异和进展的不同假设。对于副作用,还将探索与医院事件统计数据的关联,其中将记录低血糖等严重事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/ae96feaab99a/bmjopen-2017-017989f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/1d4300ecc275/bmjopen-2017-017989f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/b8ab48480c9c/bmjopen-2017-017989f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/ae96feaab99a/bmjopen-2017-017989f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/1d4300ecc275/bmjopen-2017-017989f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/b8ab48480c9c/bmjopen-2017-017989f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/663c/5652624/ae96feaab99a/bmjopen-2017-017989f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Cohort profile for the MASTERMIND study: using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to investigate stratification of response to treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.MASTERMIND研究的队列概况:利用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)调查2型糖尿病患者治疗反应的分层情况
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 12;7(10):e017989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017989.
2
Adherence to Oral Glucose-Lowering Therapies and Associations With 1-Year HbA1c: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis in a Large Primary Care Database.口服降糖治疗的依从性及其与1年糖化血红蛋白的关联:一项基于大型初级保健数据库的回顾性队列分析
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):258-263. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1194. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
3
Changes in HbA1c and weight, and treatment persistence, over the 18 months following initiation of second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink.在开始二线治疗后 18 个月内,2 型糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 和体重变化以及治疗持久性:来自英国临床实践研究数据库的结果。
BMC Med. 2018 Jul 16;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1085-8.
4
A five-drug class model using routinely available clinical features to optimise prescribing in type 2 diabetes: a prediction model development and validation study.一种利用常规可用临床特征优化2型糖尿病处方的五药类模型:一项预测模型开发与验证研究。
Lancet. 2025 Mar 1;405(10480):701-714. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02617-5. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
5
Patterns of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating second-line therapy after metformin monotherapy: Retrospective data for 10 256 individuals from the United Kingdom and Germany.二甲双胍单药治疗后起始二线治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制模式:来自英国和德国的 10256 个人的回顾性数据。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):389-399. doi: 10.1111/dom.13083. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of a 4-year (208-week) phase III trial of empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, versus glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with insufficient glycemic control.恩格列净,一种 SGLT2 抑制剂,作为二甲双胍添加治疗用于血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的 4 年(208 周)III 期临床试验的原理、设计和基线特征:与格列美脲比较。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Sep 5;12:129. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-129.
7
What to do with diabetes therapies when HbA1c lowering is inadequate: add, switch, or continue? A MASTERMIND study.当 HbA1c 降低不充分时,应如何处理糖尿病治疗药物:加用、转换还是继续使用?一项 MASTERMIND 研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 12;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1307-8.
8
Development of a treatment selection algorithm for SGLT2 and DPP-4 inhibitor therapies in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.开发用于 2 型糖尿病患者的 SGLT2 和 DPP-4 抑制剂治疗的治疗选择算法:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Dec;4(12):e873-e883. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00174-1.
9
Sex and BMI Alter the Benefits and Risks of Sulfonylureas and Thiazolidinediones in Type 2 Diabetes: A Framework for Evaluating Stratification Using Routine Clinical and Individual Trial Data.性别和 BMI 改变了磺酰脲类药物和噻唑烷二酮类药物在 2 型糖尿病中的获益和风险:使用常规临床和个体试验数据评估分层的框架。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Sep;41(9):1844-1853. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0344. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Hypoglycaemic symptoms, treatment satisfaction, adherence and their associations with glycaemic goal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) Study.2型糖尿病患者的低血糖症状、治疗满意度、依从性及其与血糖目标的关联:糖尿病管理的现实生活有效性和护理模式(RECAP-DM)研究的结果
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Jun;10 Suppl 1:25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00882.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating prediction of short-term tolerability of five type 2 diabetes drug classes using routine clinical features: UK population-based study.利用常规临床特征评估五类2型糖尿病药物的短期耐受性预测:基于英国人群的研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27(8):4320-4329. doi: 10.1111/dom.16470. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Safety and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a UK population with type 2 diabetes and aged over 70 years: an instrumental variable approach.SGLT2 抑制剂在英国 2 型糖尿病且年龄超过 70 岁人群中的安全性和有效性:一种工具变量法。
Diabetologia. 2024 Sep;67(9):1817-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06190-9. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review.非随机纵向研究中未测量混杂因素的调整:方法学综述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;87:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
2
Longitudinal multiple imputation approaches for body mass index or other variables with very low individual-level variability: the mibmi command in Stata.针对体重指数或其他个体水平变异性极低的变量的纵向多重填补方法:Stata中的mibmi命令
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jan 13;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2365-z.
3
Adherence to Oral Glucose-Lowering Therapies and Associations With 1-Year HbA1c: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis in a Large Primary Care Database.
Phenotype-based targeted treatment of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes.
基于表型的 SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病中的靶向治疗。
Diabetologia. 2024 May;67(5):822-836. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06099-3. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Comparison of causal forest and regression-based approaches to evaluate treatment effect heterogeneity: an application for type 2 diabetes precision medicine.因果森林与基于回归方法比较评估治疗效果异质性:2 型糖尿病精准医学的应用
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02207-2.
5
"Take up to eight tablets per day": Incorporating free-text medication instructions into a transparent and reproducible process for preparing drug exposure data for pharmacoepidemiology.“每日最多服用八片”:将自由文本药物说明纳入透明且可重复的药物暴露数据制备流程,以用于药物流行病学研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jun;32(6):651-660. doi: 10.1002/pds.5595. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
6
Adherence to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes: a combined method approach.2型糖尿病成人患者对二甲双胍的依从性:一种联合方法
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Oct 12;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00457-5.
7
Diabetes and Obesity in Down Syndrome Across the Lifespan: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using U.K. Electronic Health Records.唐氏综合征患者全生命周期中的糖尿病与肥胖:一项使用英国电子健康记录的回顾性队列研究
Diabetes Care. 2022 Sep 30;45(12):2892-9. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0482.
8
Adherence to and persistence with antidiabetic medications and associations with clinical and economic outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic literature review.2 型糖尿病患者抗糖尿病药物的依从性和持久性及其与临床和经济结局的关系:系统文献回顾。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Mar;24(3):377-390. doi: 10.1111/dom.14603. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Electronic Medical Record-Based Case Phenotyping for the Charlson Conditions: Scoping Review.基于电子病历的查尔森合并症病例表型分析:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Feb 1;9(2):e23934. doi: 10.2196/23934.
10
Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in UK patients with atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.在伴有 2 型糖尿病的英国心房颤动患者中,直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的疗效和安全性比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):1293-1320. doi: 10.1002/pds.5181. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
口服降糖治疗的依从性及其与1年糖化血红蛋白的关联:一项基于大型初级保健数据库的回顾性队列分析
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):258-263. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1194. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.
5
Markers of β-Cell Failure Predict Poor Glycemic Response to GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes.β细胞功能衰竭标志物可预测2型糖尿病患者对GLP-1受体激动剂治疗的血糖反应不佳。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):250-7. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0258. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
6
Reporting guidelines for pharmacoepidemiological studies are urgently needed.
BMJ. 2014 Sep 17;349:g5511. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5511.
7
Observational studies: getting clear about transparency.观察性研究:明确透明度问题。
PLoS Med. 2014 Aug 26;11(8):e1001711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711. eCollection 2014 Aug.
8
Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource.以普通实践研究数据库为例,简述英国初级保健数据资源的效用和使用方面的最新进展。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;3(2):89-99. doi: 10.1177/2042098611435911.
9
ClinicalCodes: an online clinical codes repository to improve the validity and reproducibility of research using electronic medical records.临床编码:一个在线临床编码库,用于提高使用电子病历进行研究的有效性和可重复性。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099825. eCollection 2014.
10
Prevalence and characteristics in coding, classification and diagnosis of diabetes in primary care.基层医疗中糖尿病编码、分类和诊断的流行情况和特征。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Jan;90(1059):13-7. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132068. Epub 2013 Nov 13.