Gan Tong J
Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
This review provides an overview of the clinical issue of poorly controlled postoperative pain and therapeutic approaches that may help to address this common unresolved health-care challenge. Postoperative pain is not adequately managed in greater than 80% of patients in the US, although rates vary depending on such factors as type of surgery performed, analgesic/anesthetic intervention used, and time elapsed after surgery. Poorly controlled acute postoperative pain is associated with increased morbidity, functional and quality-of-life impairment, delayed recovery time, prolonged duration of opioid use, and higher health-care costs. In addition, the presence and intensity of acute pain during or after surgery is predictive of the development of chronic pain. More effective analgesic/anesthetic measures in the perioperative period are needed to prevent the progression to persistent pain. Although clinical findings are inconsistent, some studies of local anesthetics and nonopioid analgesics have suggested potential benefits as preventive interventions. Conventional opioids remain the standard of care for the management of acute postoperative pain; however, the risk of opioid-related adverse events can limit optimal dosing for analgesia, leading to poorly controlled acute postoperative pain. Several new opioids have been developed that modulate μ-receptor activity by selectively engaging intracellular pathways associated with analgesia and not those associated with adverse events, creating a wider therapeutic window than unselective conventional opioids. In clinical studies, oliceridine (TRV130), a novel μ-receptor G-protein pathway-selective modulator, produced rapid postoperative analgesia with reduced prevalence of adverse events versus morphine.
本综述概述了术后疼痛控制不佳这一临床问题以及可能有助于应对这一常见且尚未解决的医疗保健挑战的治疗方法。在美国,超过80%的患者术后疼痛未得到充分管理,不过具体比例因手术类型、所采用的镇痛/麻醉干预措施以及术后时间等因素而有所不同。术后急性疼痛控制不佳与发病率增加、功能及生活质量受损、恢复时间延迟、阿片类药物使用时间延长以及医疗保健成本升高相关。此外,手术期间或术后急性疼痛的存在及强度可预测慢性疼痛的发生。围手术期需要更有效的镇痛/麻醉措施来预防疼痛发展为持续性疼痛。尽管临床研究结果并不一致,但一些关于局部麻醉药和非阿片类镇痛药的研究表明,它们作为预防性干预措施可能具有潜在益处。传统阿片类药物仍然是术后急性疼痛管理的护理标准;然而,阿片类药物相关不良事件的风险可能会限制镇痛的最佳剂量,导致术后急性疼痛控制不佳。已经研发出几种新型阿片类药物,它们通过选择性地激活与镇痛相关的细胞内信号通路而非与不良事件相关的信号通路来调节μ受体活性,从而比非选择性传统阿片类药物具有更宽的治疗窗。在临床研究中,新型μ受体G蛋白途径选择性调节剂oliceridine(TRV130)与吗啡相比,术后镇痛起效迅速,不良事件发生率降低。