• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性肺炎中单药治疗还是联合治疗的困境。

The dilemma of monotherapy or combination therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.

机构信息

Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece.

Department of Medicine, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Dec;47(12). doi: 10.1111/eci.12845. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1111/eci.12845
PMID:29027205
Abstract

SCOPE

To study the factors associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with monotherapy or combination therapy.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched. Patients receiving macrolides, β-lactams and fluoroquinolones, as monotherapy or in combination, were included. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty studies were included. Overall, monotherapy was not associated with higher mortality than combination (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99-1.32, I 84%). Monotherapy was associated with higher mortality than combination in North American and retrospective studies. β-lactam monotherapy was associated with higher mortality than β-lactam/macrolide combination in the primary (1.32, 1.12-1.56, I 85%) and most sensitivity analyses. There was no difference in mortality between fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam/macrolide combination (0.98, 0.78-1.23, I 73%). In meta-regressions, the moderators that could partially explain the observed statistical heterogeneity were the frequency of cancer patients (P = .03) and Pneumonia Severity Index score IV (P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Due to the considerable heterogeneity and inclusion of unadjusted data, it is difficult to recommend a specific antibiotic regimen over another. Specific antibiotic regimens, study design and the characteristics of the population under study seem to influence the reported outcomes.

摘要

范围

研究与住院社区获得性肺炎患者接受单药或联合治疗相关的死亡率因素。

方法

在 PubMed 和 Scopus 上进行检索。纳入接受大环内酯类、β-内酰胺类和氟喹诺酮类单药或联合治疗的患者。进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。

结果

共纳入 50 项研究。总体而言,与联合治疗相比,单药治疗并未导致更高的死亡率(RR 1.14,95%CI 0.99-1.32,I 84%)。在北美和回顾性研究中,单药治疗与联合治疗相比,死亡率更高。在主要分析(1.32,1.12-1.56,I 85%)和大多数敏感性分析中,β-内酰胺单药治疗与β-内酰胺/大环内酯类联合治疗相比,死亡率更高。氟喹诺酮单药治疗与β-内酰胺/大环内酯类联合治疗的死亡率无差异(0.98,0.78-1.23,I 73%)。荟萃回归分析中,部分解释观察到的统计学异质性的调节因素是癌症患者的频率(P =.03)和肺炎严重指数评分 IV(P =.008)。

结论

由于存在较大的异质性和纳入未经调整的数据,因此难以推荐特定的抗生素方案优于其他方案。具体的抗生素方案、研究设计和研究人群的特征似乎会影响报告的结果。

相似文献

1
The dilemma of monotherapy or combination therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎中单药治疗还是联合治疗的困境。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Dec;47(12). doi: 10.1111/eci.12845. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
2
Fluoroquinolones or macrolides in combination with β-lactams in adult patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氟喹诺酮类或大环内酯类联合β-内酰胺类药物治疗成人社区获得性肺炎住院患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Apr;23(4):234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
3
Fluoroquinolones or macrolides alone versus combined with β-lactams for adults with community-acquired pneumonia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.氟喹诺酮类或大环内酯类单药与β-内酰胺类联合治疗成人社区获得性肺炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Sep;46(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
4
Antibiotic treatment outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗效果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 16;48(4):730-736. doi: 10.3906/sag-1709-144.
5
Effect of β-Lactam Plus Macrolide Versus Fluoroquinolone on 30-Day Readmissions for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类联合大环内酯类与氟喹诺酮类药物对社区获得性肺炎 30 天再入院的影响。
Am J Ther. 2020 Mar/Apr;27(2):e177-e182. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000788.
6
Effectiveness of β-Lactam Monotherapy vs Macrolide Combination Therapy for Children Hospitalized With Pneumonia.β-内酰胺单药治疗与大环内酯类联合治疗对肺炎住院儿童的有效性
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1184-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3225.
7
Cardiac events after macrolides or fluoroquinolones in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia: post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized trial.大环内酯类或氟喹诺酮类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的心脏事件:一项集群随机试验的事后分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3630-7.
8
β-Lactam monotherapy vs β-lactam-macrolide combination treatment in moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized noninferiority trial.β-内酰胺单药治疗与β-内酰胺-大环内酯类药物联合治疗中度社区获得性肺炎的随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1894-901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4887.
9
Respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy vs. β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy for hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.呼吸氟喹诺酮单药治疗与β-内酰胺加大环内酯类联合治疗对住院成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Sep;62(3):106905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106905. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia.退伍军人事务部住院社区获得性肺炎患者中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类联合治疗与氟喹诺酮类单药治疗的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Nov;51(11):3977-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00006-07. Epub 2007 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of intravenous clarithromycin in patients with sepsis, respiratory and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.静脉滴注克拉霉素对脓毒症、呼吸和多器官功能障碍综合征患者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 18;26(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04055-4.
2
Meta-analysis of the effects of combination therapies of β-lactams and fluoroquinolones or macrolides in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.β-内酰胺类药物与氟喹诺酮类或大环内酯类药物联合治疗社区获得性肺炎效果的Meta分析
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):2439-2446. eCollection 2021.
3
[Recommendations for the care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the Emergency Department].
[急诊科社区获得性肺炎患者的护理建议]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018 Apr;31(2):186-202. Epub 2018 Apr 5.