Institute for Work and Health (IST), University of Lausanne and University of Geneva, Route de la Corniche 2, CH-1066 Epalinges-Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chemicals and Occupational Health Unit, Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), Holzikofenweg 36, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Oct 1;61(8):954-964. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx069.
The Advanced REACH Tool (ART) is the most sophisticated tool used for evaluating exposure levels under the European Union's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals (REACH) regulations. ART provides estimates at different percentiles of exposure and within different confidence intervals (CIs). However, its performance has only been tested on a limited number of exposure data. The present study compares ART's estimates with exposure measurements collected over many years in Switzerland. Measurements from 584 cases of exposure to vapours, mists, powders, and abrasive dusts (wood/stone and metal) were extracted from a Swiss database. The corresponding exposures at the 50th and 90th percentiles were calculated in ART. To characterize the model's performance, the 90% CI of the estimates was considered. ART's performance at the 50th percentile was only found to be insufficiently conservative with regard to exposure to wood/stone dusts, whereas the 90th percentile showed sufficient conservatism for all the types of exposure processed. However, a trend was observed with the residuals, where ART overestimated lower exposures and underestimated higher ones. The median was more precise, however, and the majority (≥60%) of real-world measurements were within a factor of 10 from ART's estimates. We provide recommendations based on the results and suggest further, more comprehensive, investigations.
高级暴露评估工具(ART)是在欧盟注册、评估、授权和限制化学品(REACH)法规下评估暴露水平的最先进工具。ART 提供了不同百分位数和置信区间(CI)下的暴露估计值。然而,它的性能仅在有限数量的暴露数据上进行了测试。本研究将 ART 的估计值与瑞士多年来收集的暴露测量值进行了比较。从瑞士数据库中提取了 584 例蒸气、雾、粉末和磨料粉尘(木材/石材和金属)暴露的测量值。在 ART 中计算了相应的 50%和 90%百分位暴露值。为了描述模型的性能,考虑了估计值的 90%CI。ART 在处理木材/石材粉尘暴露时仅被发现对 50%百分位的暴露不够保守,而 90%百分位的暴露对于所有处理的暴露类型都表现出足够的保守性。然而,残差显示出一种趋势,ART 高估了较低的暴露值,低估了较高的暴露值。中位数更准确,然而,大多数(≥60%)真实世界的测量值与 ART 估计值的比值在 10 以内。我们根据结果提供了建议,并建议进行进一步、更全面的调查。