Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1327187. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1327187. eCollection 2023.
Spraying is a common way to distribute occupational products, but it puts worker's health at risk by exposing them to potentially harmful particles and gases. The objective of this study is to use time-resolved measurements to gain an understanding of spray applications at the process level and to compare them to predictions of exposure models. We used proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) at 1-s time resolution to monitor the gas phase concentration of the solvents acetone, ethanol, butyl acetate, xylene and 1-methoxy-2-propy acetate during outdoor spraying and indoor drying of metal plate under various conditions of outdoor air supply. We found that during spraying, gas-phase exposure was dominated by the more volatile solvents acetone and ethanol, which exhibited strong concentration variations due to the outdoor winds. During drying, exposure strongly depended on the strength of ventilation. Under conditions with high supply of outdoor air, our measurements show a near-exponential decay of the solvent concentrations during drying. Conversely, under conditions without outdoor air supply, the drying process required hours, during which the less volatile solvents passed through a concentration maximum in the gas phase, so that the exposure during drying exceeded the exposure during spraying. The concentrations measured during spraying were then compared for each of the substances individually with the predictions of the exposure models ECETOC TRA, Stoffenmanager, and ART using TREXMO. For these conditions, ECETOC TRA and Stoffenmanager predicted exposures in the measured concentration range, albeit not conservative for all solvents and each application. In contrast, ART largely overestimated the exposure for the more volatile solvents acetone and ethanol and slightly underestimated exposure to 1M2PA for one spraying. ECETOC TRA and ART do not have options to predict exposure during drying. Stoffenmanager has the option to predict drying together with spraying, but not to predict the drying phase independently. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering both the spray cloud and solvent evaporation during the drying process. To improve workplace safety, there is a critical need for enhanced exposure models and comprehensive datasets for calibration and validation covering a broader range of exposure situations.
喷雾是一种常见的职业产品分配方式,但它通过使工人暴露于潜在有害颗粒和气体中来危害工人的健康。本研究的目的是使用时间分辨测量来深入了解喷雾过程,并将其与暴露模型的预测进行比较。我们使用质子转移反应飞行时间质谱(PTR-ToF-MS)以 1 秒的时间分辨率监测了溶剂丙酮、乙醇、乙酸丁酯、二甲苯和 1-甲氧基-2-丙基乙酸酯在户外喷雾和金属板室内干燥过程中的气相浓度,在不同的户外空气供应条件下。我们发现,在喷雾过程中,气相暴露主要由更易挥发的溶剂丙酮和乙醇主导,由于户外风的影响,它们的浓度变化很大。在干燥过程中,暴露强烈依赖于通风强度。在有大量户外空气供应的条件下,我们的测量结果表明,在干燥过程中溶剂浓度呈近指数衰减。相反,在没有户外空气供应的情况下,干燥过程需要数小时,在此期间,挥发性较低的溶剂在气相中通过浓度最大值,因此干燥过程中的暴露超过了喷雾过程中的暴露。然后,将每种物质在喷雾过程中测量的浓度与 ECETOC TRA、Stoffenmanager 和 ART 使用 TREXMO 的暴露模型的预测值进行了比较。对于这些条件,ECETOC TRA 和 Stoffenmanager 预测了暴露在测量浓度范围内,尽管并非所有溶剂和每种应用都保守。相比之下,ART 大大高估了更易挥发的溶剂丙酮和乙醇的暴露量,并且对一次喷雾的 1M2PA 的暴露量略有低估。ECETOC TRA 和 ART 没有预测干燥过程中暴露的选项。Stoffenmanager 有预测喷雾和干燥的选项,但没有预测干燥阶段的独立选项。我们的研究表明,在干燥过程中考虑喷雾云和溶剂蒸发都很重要。为了提高工作场所安全性,迫切需要增强暴露模型和全面的数据集来进行校准和验证,以涵盖更广泛的暴露情况。