• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠肛门切除术治疗直肠肿瘤患者预防性回肠造口早期与延迟关闭的比较:一项基于已发表随机对照试验的整合系统评价和荟萃分析。

Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of General, Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.

Department of General, Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;19(12):1050-1057. doi: 10.1111/codi.13922.

DOI:10.1111/codi.13922
PMID:29028289
Abstract

AIMS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes and feasibility of early loop defunctioning ileostomy closure, within 2 weeks of index surgery, in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on published randomized controlled trials reporting the feasibility and outcomes on early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection using the principles of meta-analysis on RevMan 5.4 statistical software was undertaken.

RESULTS

Four randomized, controlled trials on 446 patients evaluating the feasibility and outcomes on early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing low colorectal resection were analysed. There were 176 patients in the early closure group and 270 patients in the delayed closure group. The risk of anastomotic leak [risk ratio 0.37 (CI: 0.10-1.42), P = 0.15], anastomotic stenosis [risk ratio 4.79 (CI: 0.23-98.47), P = 0.31] and postoperative complications [risk ratio 0.75 (CI: 0.48-1.16), P = 0.19] was similar in both groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the duration of operation [standardized mean difference -0.49 (CI: -01.09, -0.12), P = 0.12] and length of hospitalization [standardized mean difference -0.04 (CI: -0.25, -0.18), P = 0.75].

CONCLUSIONS

Early closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection is feasible with comparable outcomes to delayed closure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在接受结直肠远端切除术的患者中,在指数手术后 2 周内早期行回肠袢式造口还纳术的手术结果和可行性。

方法

采用荟萃分析的原则,对发表的随机对照试验文献进行系统性综述,评估在接受结直肠远端切除术的患者中,早期与延迟行回肠袢式造口还纳术的可行性和结果。使用 RevMan 5.4 统计软件。

结果

对 4 项关于 446 例患者的随机对照试验进行了分析,评估了在接受结直肠低位切除术的患者中,早期与延迟行回肠袢式造口还纳术的可行性和结果。早期还纳组有 176 例患者,延迟还纳组有 270 例患者。吻合口漏的风险[风险比 0.37(CI:0.10-1.42),P=0.15]、吻合口狭窄的风险[风险比 4.79(CI:0.23-98.47),P=0.31]和术后并发症的风险[风险比 0.75(CI:0.48-1.16),P=0.19]在两组之间相似。此外,两组在手术时间[标准化均数差-0.49(CI:-01.09,-0.12),P=0.12]和住院时间[标准化均数差-0.04(CI:-0.25,-0.18),P=0.75]方面无显著差异。

结论

在接受结直肠远端切除术的患者中,早期行回肠袢式造口还纳术是可行的,其结果与延迟还纳术相当。

相似文献

1
Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.经直肠肛门切除术治疗直肠肿瘤患者预防性回肠造口早期与延迟关闭的比较:一项基于已发表随机对照试验的整合系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;19(12):1050-1057. doi: 10.1111/codi.13922.
2
Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis.回肠造口术或结肠造口术用于结直肠吻合口的临时减压。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD004647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004647.pub2.
3
Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌低位前切除术后预防性回肠造口对肠功能的影响及造口还纳时间的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jul;25(7):751-760. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02436-5. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.结直肠吻合手术中吻合器与手工缝合方法的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003144.
5
Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.术中应用吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术降低结直肠手术吻合口漏风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jan;22(1):15-23. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1731-8. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis.结直肠或结肛吻合术后粪便转流的袢式回肠造口术与袢式结肠造口术:一项荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;24(5):479-88. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0662-x. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
7
Stenting as a bridge to resection versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer with malignant obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.支架置入术作为左半结直肠癌合并恶性梗阻的桥接治疗策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.低位直肠癌手术中去功能化造口作用的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):52-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65.
9
Early vs. standard reversal ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期与标准延迟回肠造口术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Nov;26(11):851-862. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02629-6. Epub 2022 May 21.
10
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of complication rates after early and late closure of loop ileostomies: A retrospective cohort study.回肠袢式造口早期与晚期关闭术后并发症发生率的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):109432. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.109432.
2
Prevention of Incisional Hernias With Prophylactic Synthetic Mesh Placement During Stoma Reversal: A Randomized Clinical Trial.造口回纳术中预防性放置合成补片预防切口疝:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3445.
3
A predictive tool for postoperative ileus after ileostomy closure: Model development and validation.
回肠造口关闭术后肠梗阻的预测工具:模型开发与验证
Turk J Surg. 2025 Sep 3;41(3):241-247. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.2025-3-5. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
4
Superior anal function in patients undergoing stoma closure within 6 months after LAR and analysis of factors associated with LARS syndrome: insights from experienced surgeons.低位前切除术后6个月内行造口关闭术患者的肛门功能 superior 及与低位前切除术后综合征相关因素的分析:来自经验丰富外科医生的见解
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02320-z.
5
Post-surgical morbidity in early versus late closure of defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.直肠癌手术后早期与晚期关闭造口回肠袢的术后发病率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04090-9.
6
Early vs. Late Stoma Reversal After Open Low Anterior Resection Post-Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后开放性低位前切除术后早期与晚期造口回纳的比较
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):94-99. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02036-3. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
[Nursing interventions in stoma reversal: an integrative reviewIntervenções de enfermagem na inversão do estoma intestinal: uma revisão integrativa].造口回纳的护理干预:一项综合综述 肠道造口回纳的护理干预:一项综合综述
Rev Cuid. 2022 Aug 27;13(1):e14. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2165. eCollection 2022 Jan-Apr.
8
Timing and morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after rectal cancer resection: a prospective observational multicentre snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO).直肠癌切除术后袢式回肠造口关闭的时机和发病率:来自意大利多学科造口研究组(MISSTO)的一项前瞻性观察性多中心横断面研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb 18;40(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04827-8.
9
Morbidity of Temporary Loop Ileostomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌患者临时袢式回肠造口术的发病率
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;13(3):468-473. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01501-1. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
10
Optimizing the Personalized Care for the Management of Rectal Cancer: A Consensus Statement.优化直肠癌管理的个性化护理:共识声明。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug;33(8):627-663. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.211103.